FAQ
Which model is better, DBI or DBIC::Schema?
Thanks.

--
Jack Malloy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst/attachments/20090428/90d6ce54/attachment.htm

Search Discussions

  • Kieren Diment at Apr 28, 2009 at 9:52 am

    On 28/04/2009, at 7:38 PM, Malloy wrote:

    Which model is better, DBI or DBIC::Schema?
    Thanks.
    Err, they do different things. Use the latter if you want to use
    DBIx::Class (recommended) or the former if you want to use plain DBI.
    You can also use both in the same app if you like.
  • Matt S Trout at Apr 28, 2009 at 8:08 pm

    On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:38:57PM +0800, Malloy wrote:
    Which model is better, DBI or DBIC::Schema?
    If you're asking, you should probably be using DBIC::Schema since it's most
    popular so the best integrated and easy to get help with.

    --
    Matt S Trout Catalyst and DBIx::Class consultancy with a clue:
    Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
    Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Any questions? Mail mst <at> shadowcat.co.uk
    My blog: http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ (warning: profanity)
  • Mamod at Apr 28, 2009 at 9:13 pm
    Which model is better, DBI or DBIC::Schema?
    When I started using DBIC, I managed to keep using DBI for tasks I
    couldn't implement in DBIC but then with time totally moved to DBIC
    which is simpler and much fun to do tasks with
  • Ben Vinnerd at Apr 29, 2009 at 8:05 am

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupcatalyst @
categoriescatalyst, perl
postedApr 28, '09 at 9:38a
activeApr 29, '09 at 8:05a
posts5
users5
websitecatalystframework.org
irc#catalyst

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase