Sorry, I meant R13-B3 (mentioned in the Windows section).
Thanks for the info.
From: rabbitmq-discuss-bounces at lists.rabbitmq.com [mailto:rabbitmq-discuss-bounces at lists.rabbitmq.com] On Behalf Of Simon MacMullen
Sent: 11 January 2011 18:28
To: rabbitmq-discuss at lists.rabbitmq.com
Subject: Re: [rabbitmq-discuss] Erlang version for Rabbit MQ 2.2.0 on Redhat Enterprise 5.5
On 11/01/11 17:39, Jon Rowland wrote:
I'm looking to install rabbitmq server onto a production machine, and am
a little confused as to the erlang dependencies. I see that version
R12-B3 is mentioned in one place, and R13-B5 in another (admittedly
Windows which could be different).
I don't see a reference to R13-B5 anywhere, but yes, we do end up
mentioning a lot of versions.
We support back to R12-B3, but we tend to only test that on Unix since
the main reason to run an old Erlang is "it comes with Red Hat / Debian".
We will be installing version 2.2.0 from RPM on a RedHat Enterprise 5.5
server. Following the yum/EPEL route gives me the erlang version R12-B5.
Could anyone please clarify if this combination is suitable?
That will work. However:
* SSL support is quite unreliable
* Performance of garbage collection is not as good
* Many plugins will not work
Whether to go down the route of trying to get a more modern Erlang
depends on how you feel about these things versus how you feel about
using the official packages.
If you decide you do need a newer Erlang, I've heard that RPM users have
had success with the following procedure:
* Open the SRPM
* Replace the R12-B5 tarball with the latest version
* Replace various references to the version in the spec file
* Repack the SRPM
* Build the RPM from the SRPM
This is likely to be less ugly than installing from source directly on a