|| at Dec 22, 2010 at 10:13 pm
On 12/22/2010 10:32 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Karim, 22.12.2010 22:09:
Using lxml (except for the different import) will be fully compliant
the ET code.
Do I have to adapt it?
There are certain differences.http://codespeak.net/lxml/compatibility.html
This page hasn't been changed for ages, but it should still be mostly
I will have a look. Anyway, I must delivered my current version.
I got 300 lines of codes which should be easily translated for
the improved future version.
I saw your fantastic benchmarks! Why the hell lxml is not integrated
I thought they put in it things which works at best for python
I proposed it but it was rejected with the argument that it's a huge
dependency and brings in two large C libraries that will be hard to
control for future long-term maintenance. I think that's a reasonable
One can never says never...
They will reconsider it I think.
Thanks for your support!