[Mailman-Users] integrating htdig with cpanel mailman - Grokbase

Grokbase › Groups › Python › mailman-users › September 2015

FAQ

[Mailman-Users] integrating htdig with cpanel mailman

	Jason Fayre
	Sep 1, 2015 at 7:32 pm

Hello,
I'm attempting to get Mailman 2.1.20 working with htdig.
I've installed the htdig patch for this version of Mailman from Mark's site.
When I run a search from the archive pages, I get a blank page.
I've seen others asking this, but have never seen a solution.
I think I may have had this working a few years ago, but don't remember what
I did to fix it. It broke when cpanel updated mailman.
When I try running the mmsearch script by itself, I get the following error,
which is expected as I under stand it:
htdig Archives Access Failure
CGI problem. -5-Field count -4- fields:
If you want to make another attempt to access a list archive then go via the
list users information page.

If this problem persists then please e-mail the following information to the
mailman at nfbnet.org:
Referer not known
/mailman/mmsearch/blparent_nfbnet.org

Running the htsearch command by itself doesn't yield any results with a
keyword and the short format.
The version of htdig is 3.2.0b6. I noticed that there are patched versions
of rundig and the nightly scripts on the patch site, but don't know if that
applies to newer patches or not.

Any help would be appreciated.

Search Discussions

15 responses
Oldest
Nested

Mark Sapiro

at Sep 2, 2015 at 7:03 am

⇧

On 09/01/2015 12:32 PM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hello,
I'm attempting to get Mailman 2.1.20 working with htdig.
I've installed the htdig patch for this version of Mailman from Mark's site.

I'd be surprised if this doesn't have conflicts with cPanel's mods. What
happened when you ran patch? were there any rejects?

When I run a search from the archive pages, I get a blank page.
I've seen others asking this, but have never seen a solution.
I think I may have had this working a few years ago, but don't remember what
I did to fix it. It broke when cpanel updated mailman.

Not surprising. cPanel's mailman has many patches of its own, mostly
because of the list name = name_domain feature to allow lists of the
same 'name' in different domains.

When I try running the mmsearch script by itself, I get the following error,
which is expected as I under stand it:
htdig Archives Access Failure
CGI problem. -5-Field count -4- fields:

Yes, this is expected. You could try going to a URL like

<http://example.com/mailman/mmsearch/LISTNAME?method=and&format=short&sort=score&config=LISTNAME>

If you want to make another attempt to access a list archive then go via the
list users information page.

If this problem persists then please e-mail the following information to the
mailman at nfbnet.org:
Referer not known
/mailman/mmsearch/blparent_nfbnet.org

The above is not familiar to me. It may be a cPanel thing.

Running the htsearch command by itself doesn't yield any results with a
keyword and the short format.

Do you specify the -c option with an appropriate config file?

The version of htdig is 3.2.0b6. I noticed that there are patched versions
of rundig and the nightly scripts on the patch site, but don't know if that
applies to newer patches or not.

Those patches allow the nightly update to do an update rather than a
complete rebuild of the htdig search index.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Jason Fayre

at Sep 2, 2015 at 1:22 pm

⇧

Hello,
I do not get any rejects when applying the patch.
I did pass the config file for the list to htsearch with the -c option.
Any other ideas?
How are people typically handling archive search? I know I could use
mail-archive, but would rather handle things on our end if we can.
Occasionally we need to remove messages from the archives and not sure how
easy that is with mail-archive.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mailman-Users [mailto:mailman-users-bounces+jason=fayre.me at python.org]
On Behalf Of Mark Sapiro
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 3:04 AM
To: mailman-users at python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] integrating htdig with cpanel mailman

On 09/01/2015 12:32 PM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hello,
I'm attempting to get Mailman 2.1.20 working with htdig.
I've installed the htdig patch for this version of Mailman from Mark's

site.

I'd be surprised if this doesn't have conflicts with cPanel's mods. What
happened when you ran patch? were there any rejects?

When I run a search from the archive pages, I get a blank page.
I've seen others asking this, but have never seen a solution.
I think I may have had this working a few years ago, but don't
remember what I did to fix it. It broke when cpanel updated mailman.

Not surprising. cPanel's mailman has many patches of its own, mostly because
of the list name = name_domain feature to allow lists of the same 'name' in
different domains.

When I try running the mmsearch script by itself, I get the following
error, which is expected as I under stand it:
htdig Archives Access Failure
CGI problem. -5-Field count -4- fields:

Yes, this is expected. You could try going to a URL like

<http://example.com/mailman/mmsearch/LISTNAME?method=and&format=short&sort=s
core&config=LISTNAME>

If you want to make another attempt to access a list archive then go
via the list users information page.

If this problem persists then please e-mail the following information
to the
mailman at nfbnet.org:
Referer not known
/mailman/mmsearch/blparent_nfbnet.org

The above is not familiar to me. It may be a cPanel thing.

Running the htsearch command by itself doesn't yield any results with
a keyword and the short format.

Do you specify the -c option with an appropriate config file?

The version of htdig is 3.2.0b6. I noticed that there are patched
versions of rundig and the nightly scripts on the patch site, but
don't know if that applies to newer patches or not.

Those patches allow the nightly update to do an update rather than a
complete rebuild of the htdig search index.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy:
http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/jason%40fayre.me

reply | permalink

Mark Sapiro

at Sep 2, 2015 at 3:46 pm

⇧

On 09/02/2015 06:22 AM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hello,
I do not get any rejects when applying the patch.
I did pass the config file for the list to htsearch with the -c option.
Any other ideas?

The attached htsearch.txt is a transcript of an htsearch interaction on
my system. If you do the same do you get similar output? If not, your
htdig installation is broken.

How are people typically handling archive search? I know I could use
mail-archive, but would rather handle things on our end if we can.

I use htdig with Richard Barrett's patches as forward ported by me.
Other suggestions are in the FAQ at <http://wiki.list.org/x/4030514>.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
-------------- next part --------------
mark at sbh16:~$ /opt/www/cgi-bin/htsearch -c /var/lib/mailman/archives/htdig/mailman.conf
Enter value for words: two words
Content-type: text/html

Enter value for format: short
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><head><title>No match for '(two or twos) and (words or word or worded or wording or wordings)'</title></head>
<body bgcolor="#eef7ff">
<h1><img src="/htdig/htdig.gif" alt="ht://Dig">
Search results</h1>
<hr noshade size="4">
<h2>No matches were found for '(two or twos) and (words or word or worded or wording or wordings)'</h2>
<p>
Check the spelling of the search word(s) you used.
If the spelling is correct and you only used one word,
try using one or more similar search words with "<strong>Any</strong>."
</p><p>
If the spelling is correct and you used more than one
word with "<strong>Any</strong>," try using one or more similar search
words with "<strong>Any</strong>."</p><p>
If the spelling is correct and you used more than one
word with "<strong>All</strong>," try using one or more of the same words
with "<strong>Any</strong>."</p>
<hr noshade size="4">
<form method="get" action="https://sbh16.songbird.com/mailman/mmsearch/mailman">
<font size="-1">
<input type="hidden" name="config" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="restrict" value="">
<input type="hidden" name="exclude" value="">
Match: <select name="method">
<option value="and" selected>All
<option value="or">Any
<option value="boolean">Boolean
</select>

Format: <select name="format">
<option value="long">Long
<option value="short" selected>Short
</select>

Sort by: <select name="sort">
<option value="score" selected>Score
<option value="time">Time
<option value="title">Title
<option value="revscore">Reverse Score
<option value="revtime">Reverse Time
<option value="revtitle">Reverse Title
</select>

<br>
Refine search:
<input type="text" size="30" name="words" value="two words">
<input type="submit" value="Search">
</font>
</form>
<hr noshade size="4">
<a href="http://www.htdig.org/">
<img src="/htdig/htdig.gif" border="0" alt="">ht://Dig 3.2.0b6</a>
</body></html>
mark at sbh16:~$

reply | permalink

Jason Fayre

at Sep 2, 2015 at 3:54 pm

⇧

Ok, I will try that.
What version of htdig are you running?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:mark at msapiro.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 11:46 AM
To: Jason Fayre <[email protected]>; mailman-users at python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] integrating htdig with cpanel mailman

On 09/02/2015 06:22 AM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hello,
I do not get any rejects when applying the patch.
I did pass the config file for the list to htsearch with the -c option.
Any other ideas?

The attached htsearch.txt is a transcript of an htsearch interaction on my
system. If you do the same do you get similar output? If not, your htdig
installation is broken.

How are people typically handling archive search? I know I could use
mail-archive, but would rather handle things on our end if we can.

I use htdig with Richard Barrett's patches as forward ported by me.
Other suggestions are in the FAQ at <http://wiki.list.org/x/4030514>.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Mark Sapiro

at Sep 2, 2015 at 4:30 pm

⇧

On 09/02/2015 08:54 AM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Ok, I will try that.
What version of htdig are you running?

3.2.0b6 with the rundig.0 patch from
<ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.2.0b6/> and with this patch the
source of which I no longer remember and can't find.

RCS file: /cvsroot/htdig/htdig/htsearch/Collection.h,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -r1.4 Collection.h
39c39
< void Collection::Open();
---

void Open();

41c41
< void Collection::Close();
---

void Close();

Also, in an earlier reply I wrote:

If you want to make another attempt to access a list archive then go via the
list users information page.

If this problem persists then please e-mail the following information to the
mailman at nfbnet.org:
Referer not known
/mailman/mmsearch/blparent_nfbnet.org

The above is not familiar to me. It may be a cPanel thing.

Actually, that is also part of the normal expected output from running
mmsearch with no parameters.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Jason Fayre

at Sep 2, 2015 at 6:13 pm

⇧

Absolutely unbelievable!
I got results to come up by simlinking /var/www/html/htdig to
/usr/share/htdig. Apparently this path is hard-coded in the binaries.
I installed htdig from the Centos 6.7 packages. It wouldn't compile from
source for some reason.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:mark at msapiro.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:31 PM
To: Jason Fayre <[email protected]>; mailman-users at python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] integrating htdig with cpanel mailman

On 09/02/2015 08:54 AM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Ok, I will try that.
What version of htdig are you running?

3.2.0b6 with the rundig.0 patch from
<ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.2.0b6/> and with this patch the source
of which I no longer remember and can't find.

RCS file: /cvsroot/htdig/htdig/htsearch/Collection.h,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -r1.4 Collection.h
39c39
< void Collection::Open();
---

void Open();

41c41
< void Collection::Close();
---

void Close();

Also, in an earlier reply I wrote:

If you want to make another attempt to access a list archive then go
via the list users information page.

If this problem persists then please e-mail the following information
to the mailman at nfbnet.org:
Referer not known
/mailman/mmsearch/blparent_nfbnet.org

The above is not familiar to me. It may be a cPanel thing.

Actually, that is also part of the normal expected output from running
mmsearch with no parameters.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Jason Fayre

at Sep 2, 2015 at 7:02 pm

⇧

Hi,
Almost got it. Since some of our lists are very large and the archives go
back almost 7 years, generating the indexes can take a very long time.
To be able to update the indexes, do I need both the rundig and
nightly_htdig patches from msapiro.net/mm? The rundig patch failed when I
tried to patch the rundig from 3.2.0b6.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:mark at msapiro.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:31 PM
To: Jason Fayre <[email protected]>; mailman-users at python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] integrating htdig with cpanel mailman

On 09/02/2015 08:54 AM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Ok, I will try that.
What version of htdig are you running?

3.2.0b6 with the rundig.0 patch from
<ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.2.0b6/> and with this patch the source
of which I no longer remember and can't find.

RCS file: /cvsroot/htdig/htdig/htsearch/Collection.h,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -r1.4 Collection.h
39c39
< void Collection::Open();
---

void Open();

41c41
< void Collection::Close();
---

void Close();

Also, in an earlier reply I wrote:

If you want to make another attempt to access a list archive then go
via the list users information page.

If this problem persists then please e-mail the following information
to the mailman at nfbnet.org:
Referer not known
/mailman/mmsearch/blparent_nfbnet.org

The above is not familiar to me. It may be a cPanel thing.

Actually, that is also part of the normal expected output from running
mmsearch with no parameters.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Mark Sapiro Yes, you need both. How did the rundig patch fail? -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

Mark Sapiro at Sep 2, 2015 at 8:23 pm ⇧

On 09/02/2015 12:02 PM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hi,
Almost got it. Since some of our lists are very large and the archives go
back almost 7 years, generating the indexes can take a very long time.
To be able to update the indexes, do I need both the rundig and
nightly_htdig patches from msapiro.net/mm? The rundig patch failed when I
tried to patch the rundig from 3.2.0b6.

Yes, you need both. How did the rundig patch fail?

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Jason Fayre

at Sep 2, 2015 at 11:44 pm

⇧

Hi,
Here is a script from when I ran the patch:
Script started on Wed 02 Sep 2015 11:35:43 PM UTC
root at host [/usr/bin]# patch < ~/rundig
patching file rundig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 16 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 59.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 78 (offset 4 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file rundig.rej
root at host [/usr/bin]# cat rundig.rej
--- rundig 2008-12-26 15:55:25.000000000 -0800
+++ rundig 2008-12-26 17:41:43.000000000 -0800
@@ -59,7 +61,7 @@
   TMPDIR=$DBDIR
   export TMPDIR

-$BINDIR/htdig -i $opts $stats $alt
+$BINDIR/htdig $init $opts $stats $alt
   $BINDIR/htpurge $opts $alt
   case "$alt" in
   -a)
root at host [/usr/bin]#

On 2015-09-02 4:23 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:

On 09/02/2015 12:02 PM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hi,
Almost got it. Since some of our lists are very large and the archives go
back almost 7 years, generating the indexes can take a very long time.
To be able to update the indexes, do I need both the rundig and
nightly_htdig patches from msapiro.net/mm? The rundig patch failed when I
tried to patch the rundig from 3.2.0b6.

Yes, you need both. How did the rundig patch fail?

reply | permalink

Mark Sapiro

at Sep 3, 2015 at 12:02 am

⇧

On 09/02/2015 04:44 PM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hi,
Here is a script from when I ran the patch:
Script started on Wed 02 Sep 2015 11:35:43 PM UTC
root at host [/usr/bin]# patch < ~/rundig
patching file rundig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 16 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 59.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 78 (offset 4 lines).
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file rundig.rej
root at host [/usr/bin]# cat rundig.rej
--- rundig 2008-12-26 15:55:25.000000000 -0800
+++ rundig 2008-12-26 17:41:43.000000000 -0800
@@ -59,7 +61,7 @@
TMPDIR=$DBDIR
export TMPDIR

-$BINDIR/htdig -i $opts $stats $alt
+$BINDIR/htdig $init $opts $stats $alt
$BINDIR/htpurge $opts $alt
case "$alt" in
-a)
root at host [/usr/bin]#

I don't understand this. My rundig is probably different from yours in
that I applied the patch from
<ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.2.0b6/rundig.0> before creating the
rundig patch you are applying, but this should only result in a couple
of line # offsets, not a failure of hunk 2 or fuzz in hunk 1.

Send me a copy of your rundig off list and I'll look at it.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Mark Sapiro Forwarding to mailman-users for completeness. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

Mark Sapiro at Sep 3, 2015 at 12:33 am ⇧

Forwarding to mailman-users for completeness.

On 09/02/2015 05:29 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 09/02/2015 05:07 PM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Here you go.
Thanks so much for your help on this!
This rundig is from the centos 6.7 htdig package.

Your rundig has been modified from the 3.2.0b6 htdig base. The base
rundig always does a full rebuild of the index My patch to rundig adds a
'-u' option to do an 'update' rather than a full rebuild. Your
RedHat/Centos package rundig already has this option only it's '-i' for
incremental.

Thus, you don't need to patch your rundig at all unless you want to
uncomment line 79 (which my patch does) per lines 77-79

# If you want to use the soundex and (or) metaphone fuzzy matchings,
# Uncomment the following line
# $BINDIR/htfuzzy $opts soundex metaphone

What you do need to do however is change nightly_htdig. My patch added
amongst other things the line

init_or_update = ' -u'

per

@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@
# test if the archive volume directories mod times have
# changed
recent_posts = None
+ init_or_update = ' -u'
rundig_run_file = os.path.join(list_htdig_dir, 'rundig_last_run')
archive = HyperArch.HyperArchive(mlist)
try:

You need to change that to

init_or_update = ' -i'

because in your rundig the 'incremental' option is '-i', not '-u'.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Jason Fayre

at Sep 3, 2015 at 3:02 pm

⇧

Hello,
I made the modifications you suggested.
Now when I run nightly_htdig on a list, I get an error back that "I" is an
invalid option for htfuzzy. I uncommented that line in the rundig script.
Any ideas?
If it isn't critical, I can just re-comment that line.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mailman-Users [mailto:mailman-users-bounces+jason=fayre.me at python.org]
On Behalf Of Mark Sapiro
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:34 PM
To: Mailman Users <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] integrating htdig with cpanel mailman

Forwarding to mailman-users for completeness.

On 09/02/2015 05:29 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:

On 09/02/2015 05:07 PM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Here you go.
Thanks so much for your help on this!
This rundig is from the centos 6.7 htdig package.

Your rundig has been modified from the 3.2.0b6 htdig base. The base
rundig always does a full rebuild of the index My patch to rundig adds
a '-u' option to do an 'update' rather than a full rebuild. Your
RedHat/Centos package rundig already has this option only it's '-i'
for incremental.

Thus, you don't need to patch your rundig at all unless you want to
uncomment line 79 (which my patch does) per lines 77-79

# If you want to use the soundex and (or) metaphone fuzzy matchings, #
Uncomment the following line # $BINDIR/htfuzzy $opts soundex metaphone

What you do need to do however is change nightly_htdig. My patch added
amongst other things the line

init_or_update = ' -u'

per

@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@
# test if the archive volume directories mod times have
# changed
recent_posts = None
+ init_or_update = ' -u'
rundig_run_file = os.path.join(list_htdig_dir, 'rundig_last_run')
archive = HyperArch.HyperArchive(mlist)
try:

You need to change that to

init_or_update = ' -i'

because in your rundig the 'incremental' option is '-i', not '-u'.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan
------------------------------------------------------
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy:
http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/jason%40fayre.me

reply | permalink

Mark Sapiro

at Sep 3, 2015 at 5:11 pm

⇧

On 09/03/2015 08:02 AM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hello,
I made the modifications you suggested.
Now when I run nightly_htdig on a list, I get an error back that "I" is an
invalid option for htfuzzy. I uncommented that line in the rundig script.
Any ideas?
If it isn't critical, I can just re-comment that line.

I'm sorry. I didn't keep the rundig you sent me so I can't be sure, but
it appears that RedHat's modified rundig may be broken in some way.

On the other hand, if in making the mod to nightly_htdig you have

init_or_update = ' -I'

that is the problem. it needs to be lower case ' -i'.

If that doesn't explain it, you can send me the rundig again and I'll
look further.

Whether or not you want the uncommented

$BINDIR/htfuzzy $opts soundex metaphone

line is up to you. What this does is enable the search to match
alternate spellings of the search words that 'sound alike'.

However, even if you re-comment that line, there may be other problems
even if it doesn't complain.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Jason Fayre

at Sep 3, 2015 at 6:29 pm

⇧

Hi,
I finally got htdig to compile from source. So, I got rid of the centos
package and am now using a vanilla build. The rundig patch applied correctly
now.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:mark at msapiro.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 1:11 PM
To: Jason Fayre <[email protected]>; 'Mailman Users' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] integrating htdig with cpanel mailman

On 09/03/2015 08:02 AM, Jason Fayre wrote:
Hello,
I made the modifications you suggested.
Now when I run nightly_htdig on a list, I get an error back that "I"
is an invalid option for htfuzzy. I uncommented that line in the rundig script.
Any ideas?
If it isn't critical, I can just re-comment that line.

I'm sorry. I didn't keep the rundig you sent me so I can't be sure, but it
appears that RedHat's modified rundig may be broken in some way.

On the other hand, if in making the mod to nightly_htdig you have

init_or_update = ' -I'

that is the problem. it needs to be lower case ' -i'.

If that doesn't explain it, you can send me the rundig again and I'll look
further.

Whether or not you want the uncommented

$BINDIR/htfuzzy $opts soundex metaphone

line is up to you. What this does is enable the search to match alternate
spellings of the search words that 'sound alike'.

However, even if you re-comment that line, there may be other problems even
if it doesn't complain.

--
Mark Sapiro <[email protected]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan

reply | permalink

Laura Creighton cheer! :) Laura

Laura Creighton at Sep 3, 2015 at 9:50 pm ⇧

In a message of Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:29:37 -0400, "Jason Fayre" writes:
Hi,
I finally got htdig to compile from source. So, I got rid of the centos
package and am now using a vanilla build. The rundig patch applied correctly
now.

cheer! :)

Laura

reply | permalink

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation

view	thread \| post

Discussion Overview

group	mailman-users @
categories	python
posted	Sep 1, '15 at 7:32p
active	Sep 3, '15 at 9:50p
posts	16
users	3
website	list.org

3 users in discussion

Content

People

Users
Badges

Support

Translate

site design / logo © 2023 Grokbase