Alvaro Herrera writes:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun abr 25 17:22:41 -0300 2011:
Fix pg_size_pretty() to avoid overflow for inputs close to INT64_MAX.
Apparently this change is causing Moa's SunStudio compiler to fail an
assertion.
[ scratches head... ] Hard to see why, there's nothing at all
interesting in that code.

regards, tom lane

Search Discussions

  • Alvaro Herrera at Apr 27, 2011 at 8:36 pm

    Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié abr 27 17:10:37 -0300 2011:
    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
    Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun abr 25 17:22:41 -0300 2011:
    Fix pg_size_pretty() to avoid overflow for inputs close to INT64_MAX.
    Apparently this change is causing Moa's SunStudio compiler to fail an
    assertion.
    [ scratches head... ] Hard to see why, there's nothing at all
    interesting in that code.
    I agree, but it fails exactly in that code, and started to fail
    immediately after that patch.

    Maybe casting the 2 to int64 would fix it?

    --
    Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
    The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
    PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
grouppgsql-hackers @
categoriespostgresql
postedApr 27, '11 at 8:22p
activeApr 27, '11 at 8:36p
posts2
users2
websitepostgresql.org...
irc#postgresql

2 users in discussion

Alvaro Herrera: 1 post Tom Lane: 1 post

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase