|| at Oct 19, 2010 at 6:36 am
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:26:32AM -0700, David Fetter wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:18:25AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:05 AM, David Fetter wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:03:55AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Dmitriy Igrishin wrote:
I've asked pgsql-general.
Unfortunately it seems that there is no better way to do it except
parsing PQerrorMessage(). Sadly.
Yeah, doesn't look like it. A quick glance at the code reveals that a
PGresult can store individual error fields but a PGconn can store only
a message. :-(
Does this seem worth patching for 9.1?
Please feel free to submit a patch if you have an idea how to solve it.
Will look that over this evening and submit an idea for a patch :)
I'm pretty slammed by some other commitments at the moment. Probably
won't get a chance to do this until at least this weekend.
David Fetter <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: email@example.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate