FAQ
Edit report at https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=20317&edit=1

  ID: 20317
  Comment by: [email protected]
  Reported By: [email protected]
  Summary: Would you consider changing the license to another
                     BSD style license?
  Status: Open
  Type: Feature/Change Request
  Package: Net_FTP
  Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux
  Package Version: 1.4.0a3
  PHP Version: Irrelevant
  Roadmap Versions:
  New Comment:

Hi Team,

Debian FTP Masters seems to have a final decision about packages related
to 'PHP License' [0] in Debian repositories.

   "PHP License (any version) is suitable only for software that comes
directly from 'PHP Group', that basically means only PHP (src:php5)
itself."


Debian gives several options [1]... here are:

     1. Ask upstream to re-license the software to different free
license
        - BSD or MIT/Expat is the closest one.

     2. Show that the software in question does come from "PHP Group",
        f.e. software based on src:php5 sources. Most notable example is
        src:php-json which is copy of ext/json/ adapted to libjson-c-dev
        instead of the included JSON-IS-EVIL library.

     3. We remove the source packages from Debian.



So, hereby I'm asking again for a re-licensing under BSD|MIT|whatever
compatible with GPL if it's possible before the software is permanently
removed from Debian.

Thanks in advance.



[0]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=ondrej%40debian.org&tag=php-license-3.01
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752632#50


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2014-06-28 14:07:47] doconnor

Throw in a pull request, shouldn't be an issue.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2014-06-26 15:34:56] midget

Description:
------------
Hi Team,

This software is part of the Debian archive and will be removed from
official repositories due to licensing issues (please, see below).

Would you consider changing the license to another BSD style license?


For reference see:

  * https://bugs.debian.org/752641
  * https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html



Extracted from: https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html

License PHP:
---------------
You have a PHP add-on package (any php script/"app"/thing, not PHP
itself) and it's licensed only under the standard PHP license. That
license, up to the 3.x which is actually out, is not really usable for
anything else than PHP itself. I've mailed our -legal list about that
and got only one response, which basically supported my view on this.
Basically this license talks only about PHP, the PHP Group, and includes
Zend Engine, so its not applicable to anything else. And even worse,
older versions include the nice ad-clause.
One good solution here is to suggest a license change to your upstream,
as they clearly wanted a free one. LGPL or BSD seems to be what they
want.


Thanks in advance.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Search Discussions

  • Jorrit at Oct 24, 2014 at 9:40 pm
    Edit report at https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=20317&edit=1

      ID: 20317
      Updated by: [email protected]
      Reported By: [email protected]
      Summary: Would you consider changing the license to another
                         BSD style license?
      Status: Open
      Type: Feature/Change Request
      Package: Net_FTP
      Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux
      Package Version: 1.4.0a3
      PHP Version: Irrelevant
      Roadmap Versions:
      New Comment:

    Anything I contributed (it's not much) can be relicensed to LGPL,
    BSD or MIT.


    Previous Comments:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [2014-10-24 23:24:28] midget

    Hi Team,

    Debian FTP Masters seems to have a final decision about packages related
    to 'PHP License' [0] in Debian repositories.

       "PHP License (any version) is suitable only for software that comes
    directly from 'PHP Group', that basically means only PHP (src:php5)
    itself."


    Debian gives several options [1]... here are:

         1. Ask upstream to re-license the software to different free
    license
            - BSD or MIT/Expat is the closest one.

         2. Show that the software in question does come from "PHP Group",
            f.e. software based on src:php5 sources. Most notable example is
            src:php-json which is copy of ext/json/ adapted to libjson-c-dev
            instead of the included JSON-IS-EVIL library.

         3. We remove the source packages from Debian.



    So, hereby I'm asking again for a re-licensing under BSD|MIT|whatever
    compatible with GPL if it's possible before the software is permanently
    removed from Debian.

    Thanks in advance.



    [0]
    https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=ondrej%40debian.org&tag=php-license-3.01
    [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752632#50

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [2014-06-28 14:07:47] doconnor

    Throw in a pull request, shouldn't be an issue.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [2014-06-26 15:34:56] midget

    Description:
    ------------
    Hi Team,

    This software is part of the Debian archive and will be removed from
    official repositories due to licensing issues (please, see below).

    Would you consider changing the license to another BSD style license?


    For reference see:

      * https://bugs.debian.org/752641
      * https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html



    Extracted from: https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html

    License PHP:
    ---------------
    You have a PHP add-on package (any php script/"app"/thing, not PHP
    itself) and it's licensed only under the standard PHP license. That
    license, up to the 3.x which is actually out, is not really usable for
    anything else than PHP itself. I've mailed our -legal list about that
    and got only one response, which basically supported my view on this.
    Basically this license talks only about PHP, the PHP Group, and includes
    Zend Engine, so its not applicable to anything else. And even worse,
    older versions include the nice ad-clause.
    One good solution here is to suggest a license change to your upstream,
    as they clearly wanted a free one. LGPL or BSD seems to be what they
    want.


    Thanks in advance.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
grouppear-bugs @
categoriesphp
postedOct 24, '14 at 9:21p
activeOct 24, '14 at 9:40p
posts2
users2
websitepear.php.net

2 users in discussion

Jorrit: 1 post Midget: 1 post

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2023 Grokbase