FAQ
Edit report at https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=19790&edit=1

ID: 19790
Updated by: wenz@php.net
Reported By: Fedora at FamilleCollet dot com
Summary: Please Provides LICENSE file
-Status: Open
+Status: Feedback
Type: Feature/Change Request
Package: Text_CAPTCHA
Operating System: irrevelant
Package Version: 0.4.3
PHP Version: 5.4.10
Roadmap Versions:
New Comment:

-Status: Open
+Status: Feedback
thanks for the report! Could you point me to a PEAR package where the
LICENSE file is part of the distribution package? Then I can prepare a
new release. Or would a <license uri="...">...</license> in package.xml
suffice?


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2013-01-16 13:34:39] remicollet

Description:
------------
Fedora Packaging Guidelines requires that each RPM includes the LICENSE
file, when provided by upstream, and to request for it when missing.

So I do.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

P.S. especially for BSD which have multiple variants.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Search Discussions

  • Fedora at Jan 17, 2013 at 8:27 am
    Edit report at https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=19790&edit=1

    ID: 19790
    Comment by: fedora@famillecollet.com
    Reported By: Fedora at FamilleCollet dot com
    Summary: Please Provides LICENSE file
    Status: Feedback
    Type: Feature/Change Request
    Package: Text_CAPTCHA
    Operating System: irrevelant
    Package Version: 0.4.3
    PHP Version: 5.4.10
    Roadmap Versions:
    New Comment:

    Lot of PEAR packages include LICENSE FIle.

    Ex : Net_DNS2 (which is also BSD)
    https://code.google.com/p/netdns2/source/browse/
    Or would a <license uri="...">...</license> in package.xml suffice?
    Not enough.
    Need the file (with role="doc") in the archive.


    Previous Comments:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [2013-01-17 08:13:52] wenz

    -Status: Open
    +Status: Feedback
    thanks for the report! Could you point me to a PEAR package where the
    LICENSE file is part of the distribution package? Then I can prepare a
    new release. Or would a <license uri="...">...</license> in package.xml
    suffice?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [2013-01-16 13:34:39] remicollet

    Description:
    ------------
    Fedora Packaging Guidelines requires that each RPM includes the LICENSE
    file, when provided by upstream, and to request for it when missing.

    So I do.

    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

    P.S. especially for BSD which have multiple variants.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Wenz at Jan 24, 2013 at 7:39 pm
    Edit report at https://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=19790&edit=1

    ID: 19790
    Updated by: wenz@php.net
    Reported By: Fedora at FamilleCollet dot com
    Summary: Please Provides LICENSE file
    -Status: Feedback
    +Status: Closed
    Type: Feature/Change Request
    Package: Text_CAPTCHA
    Operating System: irrevelant
    Package Version: 0.4.3
    PHP Version: 5.4.10
    -Assigned To:
    +Assigned To: wenz
    Roadmap Versions:
    New Comment:

    -Status: Feedback
    +Status: Closed
    -Assigned To:
    +Assigned To: wenz
    Thank you for your bug report. This issue has been fixed
    in the latest released version of the package, which you can download at
    http://pear.php.net/get/

    fixed in 0.4.4 - thanks for the report!


    Previous Comments:
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [2013-01-17 08:27:10] remicollet

    Lot of PEAR packages include LICENSE FIle.

    Ex : Net_DNS2 (which is also BSD)
    https://code.google.com/p/netdns2/source/browse/
    Or would a <license uri="...">...</license> in package.xml suffice?
    Not enough.
    Need the file (with role="doc") in the archive.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [2013-01-17 08:13:52] wenz

    -Status: Open
    +Status: Feedback
    thanks for the report! Could you point me to a PEAR package where the
    LICENSE file is part of the distribution package? Then I can prepare a
    new release. Or would a <license uri="...">...</license> in package.xml
    suffice?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [2013-01-16 13:34:39] remicollet

    Description:
    ------------
    Fedora Packaging Guidelines requires that each RPM includes the LICENSE
    file, when provided by upstream, and to request for it when missing.

    So I do.

    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text

    P.S. especially for BSD which have multiple variants.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
grouppear-bugs @
categoriesphp
postedJan 17, '13 at 8:13a
activeJan 24, '13 at 7:39p
posts3
users2
websitepear.php.net

2 users in discussion

Wenz: 2 posts Fedora: 1 post

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase