|
Alex |
at May 29, 2008 at 10:31 pm
|
⇧ |
| |
Currently, searching on our index consumes around 2.5GB of ram.
This is just a single term query, nothing that requires the in memory cache like in
the FieldScoreQuery.
Alex
----------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:25:43 -0700
From: chenjian1227@gmail.com
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: lucene memory consumption
Not that I can think about. But, if you have any cached field data,
norms array, that could be huge.
Would be interested in knowing from others regarding this topic as well.
Jian
On 5/29/08, Alex wrote:Hi,
other than the in memory terms (.tii), and the few kilobytes of opened file
buffer, where are some other sources of significant memory consumption
when searching on a large index ? (> 100GB). The queries are just normal
term queries.
_________________________________________________________________
隨身的 Windows Live Messenger 和 Hotmail,不限時地掌握資訊盡在指間 — Windows Live for Mobile
http://www.msn.com.tw/msnmobile/---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
_________________________________________________________________
隨身的 Windows Live Messenger 和 Hotmail,不限時地掌握資訊盡在指間 — Windows Live for Mobile
http://www.msn.com.tw/msnmobile/---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org