Grokbase Groups Lucene dev July 2011
FAQ
make frozenbuffereddeletes more efficient for terms
---------------------------------------------------

Key: LUCENE-3342
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Robert Muir
Fix For: 3.4, 4.0
Attachments: LUCENE-3342.patch

when looking at LUCENE-3340, I thought its also ridiculous how much ram we use for delete by term.

so we can save a lot of memory, especially object overhead by being a little more efficient.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Search Discussions

  • Robert Muir (JIRA) at Jul 26, 2011 at 12:50 pm
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

    Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3342:
    --------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-3342.patch
    make frozenbuffereddeletes more efficient for terms
    ---------------------------------------------------

    Key: LUCENE-3342
    URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342
    Project: Lucene - Java
    Issue Type: Improvement
    Reporter: Robert Muir
    Fix For: 3.4, 4.0

    Attachments: LUCENE-3342.patch


    when looking at LUCENE-3340, I thought its also ridiculous how much ram we use for delete by term.
    so we can save a lot of memory, especially object overhead by being a little more efficient.
    --
    This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
    For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
  • Michael McCandless (JIRA) at Jul 26, 2011 at 12:58 pm
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13071073#comment-13071073 ]

    Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3342:
    --------------------------------------------

    Wow, this looks awesome! This should be a sizable reduction in the amount of RAM required to hold the buffered delete terms.
    make frozenbuffereddeletes more efficient for terms
    ---------------------------------------------------

    Key: LUCENE-3342
    URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342
    Project: Lucene - Java
    Issue Type: Improvement
    Reporter: Robert Muir
    Fix For: 3.4, 4.0

    Attachments: LUCENE-3342.patch


    when looking at LUCENE-3340, I thought its also ridiculous how much ram we use for delete by term.
    so we can save a lot of memory, especially object overhead by being a little more efficient.
    --
    This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
    For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
  • Robert Muir (JIRA) at Jul 29, 2011 at 12:48 am
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

    Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3342.
    ---------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
    Assignee: Robert Muir
    make frozenbuffereddeletes more efficient for terms
    ---------------------------------------------------

    Key: LUCENE-3342
    URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342
    Project: Lucene - Java
    Issue Type: Improvement
    Reporter: Robert Muir
    Assignee: Robert Muir
    Fix For: 3.4, 4.0

    Attachments: LUCENE-3342.patch


    when looking at LUCENE-3340, I thought its also ridiculous how much ram we use for delete by term.
    so we can save a lot of memory, especially object overhead by being a little more efficient.
    --
    This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
    For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
  • Simon Willnauer (JIRA) at Jul 29, 2011 at 2:14 pm
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13072841#comment-13072841 ]

    Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3342:
    -----------------------------------------

    seems like we have an related failure in LUCENE-3350
    make frozenbuffereddeletes more efficient for terms
    ---------------------------------------------------

    Key: LUCENE-3342
    URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342
    Project: Lucene - Java
    Issue Type: Improvement
    Reporter: Robert Muir
    Assignee: Robert Muir
    Fix For: 3.4, 4.0

    Attachments: LUCENE-3342.patch


    when looking at LUCENE-3340, I thought its also ridiculous how much ram we use for delete by term.
    so we can save a lot of memory, especially object overhead by being a little more efficient.
    --
    This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
    For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
  • Simon Willnauer (JIRA) at Jul 29, 2011 at 3:50 pm
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13072874#comment-13072874 ]

    Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3342:
    -----------------------------------------

    I resolved LUCENE-3350 - this was a bug in the test due to different semantics in FrozenDeletes term iteration. the returned term seems to be shared now :)
    make frozenbuffereddeletes more efficient for terms
    ---------------------------------------------------

    Key: LUCENE-3342
    URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3342
    Project: Lucene - Java
    Issue Type: Improvement
    Reporter: Robert Muir
    Assignee: Robert Muir
    Fix For: 3.4, 4.0

    Attachments: LUCENE-3342.patch


    when looking at LUCENE-3340, I thought its also ridiculous how much ram we use for delete by term.
    so we can save a lot of memory, especially object overhead by being a little more efficient.
    --
    This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
    For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupdev @
categorieslucene
postedJul 26, '11 at 12:50p
activeJul 29, '11 at 3:50p
posts6
users1
websitelucene.apache.org

1 user in discussion

Simon Willnauer (JIRA): 6 posts

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase