FAQ
Hello All,

I would like to make some enhancements to the s3n driver in branch-1.0.

Specifically, I would like to accomplish the following:
1. Backport HADOOP-5836
2. Update the jets3t library from 0.6.1 to 0.8.1. This entails code changes in the s3n driver to track API changes in jets3t version 0.8.1. I filed a jira, HADOOP-8136, to track this.

The question I have is this - where does it make sense to put these fixes in? Is there a Release 1.1.0 planned? Or is it merely a 1.0.[23] type of change?

Thanks in advance,
Jagane

Search Discussions

  • Eli Collins at Mar 5, 2012 at 6:25 pm
    Hey Jagane,

    You can target your patches against branch-1.0, and then mark them
    with fixVersion 1.0.2 if you'd like the RM to pull them in for the
    next dot release.

    Thanks,
    Eli

    On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jagane Sundar wrote:
    Hello All,

    I would like to make some enhancements to the s3n driver in branch-1.0.

    Specifically, I would like to accomplish the following:
    1. Backport HADOOP-5836
    2. Update the jets3t library from 0.6.1 to 0.8.1. This entails code changes in the s3n driver to track API changes in jets3t version 0.8.1. I filed a jira, HADOOP-8136, to track this.

    The question I have is this - where does it make sense to put these fixes in? Is there a Release 1.1.0 planned? Or is it merely a 1.0.[23] type of change?

    Thanks in advance,
    Jagane
  • Jagane Sundar at Mar 5, 2012 at 8:48 pm
    Thanks, Eli.

    I have uploaded a re-spin of the patch for HADOOP-5836 to the Jira.
    My patch for HADOOP-8136 needs to have this patch for HADOOP-5836 applied first. I will mark HADOOP-8136 with fixVersion 1.0.2.

    Jagane
    ________________________________________
    From: Eli Collins [eli@cloudera.com]
    Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:25 AM
    To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
    Subject: Re: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0 planned?

    Hey Jagane,

    You can target your patches against branch-1.0, and then mark them
    with fixVersion 1.0.2 if you'd like the RM to pull them in for the
    next dot release.

    Thanks,
    Eli

    On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jagane Sundar wrote:
    Hello All,

    I would like to make some enhancements to the s3n driver in branch-1.0.

    Specifically, I would like to accomplish the following:
    1. Backport HADOOP-5836
    2. Update the jets3t library from 0.6.1 to 0.8.1. This entails code changes in the s3n driver to track API changes in jets3t version 0.8.1. I filed a jira, HADOOP-8136, to track this.

    The question I have is this - where does it make sense to put these fixes in? Is there a Release 1.1.0 planned? Or is it merely a 1.0.[23] type of change?

    Thanks in advance,
    Jagane
  • Arun C Murthy at Mar 5, 2012 at 9:46 pm
    Apologies for being pedantic: please set the target-version to 1.0.2. The committer/RM set the fix-version after it's merged into the release branch.

    thanks,
    Arun
    On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Jagane Sundar wrote:

    Thanks, Eli.

    I have uploaded a re-spin of the patch for HADOOP-5836 to the Jira.
    My patch for HADOOP-8136 needs to have this patch for HADOOP-5836 applied first. I will mark HADOOP-8136 with fixVersion 1.0.2.

    Jagane
    ________________________________________
    From: Eli Collins [eli@cloudera.com]
    Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:25 AM
    To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
    Subject: Re: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0 planned?

    Hey Jagane,

    You can target your patches against branch-1.0, and then mark them
    with fixVersion 1.0.2 if you'd like the RM to pull them in for the
    next dot release.

    Thanks,
    Eli

    On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jagane Sundar wrote:
    Hello All,

    I would like to make some enhancements to the s3n driver in branch-1.0.

    Specifically, I would like to accomplish the following:
    1. Backport HADOOP-5836
    2. Update the jets3t library from 0.6.1 to 0.8.1. This entails code changes in the s3n driver to track API changes in jets3t version 0.8.1. I filed a jira, HADOOP-8136, to track this.

    The question I have is this - where does it make sense to put these fixes in? Is there a Release 1.1.0 planned? Or is it merely a 1.0.[23] type of change?

    Thanks in advance,
    Jagane
    --
    Arun C. Murthy
    Hortonworks Inc.
    http://hortonworks.com/
  • Jagane Sundar at Mar 5, 2012 at 9:53 pm
    Hey Arun,

    Thanks for the clarification. ('tis not pedantic - seems like good practice..)

    Jagane

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Arun C Murthy
    Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 1:46 PM
    To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
    Subject: Re: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0 planned?

    Apologies for being pedantic: please set the target-version to 1.0.2. The committer/RM set the fix-version after it's merged into the release branch.

    thanks,
    Arun
    On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Jagane Sundar wrote:

    Thanks, Eli.

    I have uploaded a re-spin of the patch for HADOOP-5836 to the Jira.
    My patch for HADOOP-8136 needs to have this patch for HADOOP-5836 applied first. I will mark HADOOP-8136 with fixVersion 1.0.2.

    Jagane
    ________________________________________
    From: Eli Collins [eli@cloudera.com]
    Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:25 AM
    To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
    Subject: Re: Some s3n improvements to the 1.0 branch? Also, is there a 1.1.0 planned?

    Hey Jagane,

    You can target your patches against branch-1.0, and then mark them
    with fixVersion 1.0.2 if you'd like the RM to pull them in for the
    next dot release.

    Thanks,
    Eli

    On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jagane Sundar wrote:
    Hello All,

    I would like to make some enhancements to the s3n driver in branch-1.0.

    Specifically, I would like to accomplish the following:
    1. Backport HADOOP-5836
    2. Update the jets3t library from 0.6.1 to 0.8.1. This entails code changes in the s3n driver to track API changes in jets3t version 0.8.1. I filed a jira, HADOOP-8136, to track this.

    The question I have is this - where does it make sense to put these fixes in? Is there a Release 1.1.0 planned? Or is it merely a 1.0.[23] type of change?

    Thanks in advance,
    Jagane
    --
    Arun C. Murthy
    Hortonworks Inc.
    http://hortonworks.com/

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupcommon-dev @
categorieshadoop
postedMar 5, '12 at 5:48p
activeMar 5, '12 at 9:53p
posts5
users3
websitehadoop.apache.org...
irc#hadoop

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase