FAQ
I've just created the 0.20-security-204 branch to start the stabilization process for 0.20.204. I hope to get the 203 branch ready for a vote next week.

Thanks,
Owen

Search Discussions

  • Allen Wittenauer at Apr 23, 2011 at 5:14 am

    On Apr 22, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:

    I've just created the 0.20-security-204 branch to start the stabilization process for 0.20.204. I hope to get the 203 branch ready for a vote next week.

    Could someone actually take the branch and try to install from scratch? i.e., not copy a pre-existing config. I found a multitude of problems with 203 doing this, but haven't had a chance to file JIRAs for all of them. (Pay attention to the log messages in particular). I'm not going to be able to do this for various reasons.

    There are also a lot of places where hadoop-*-{core|hdfs|mapred} are referenced in the documentation, but since this release breaks with 0.20.{0-2}, all of those documentation references need to be fixed.

    As it stands, I wouldn't want to use this release in production. In addition to the previously mentioned issues, the job size unpredictability/regression with capacity scheduler is particularly disturbing. The math we're seeing doesn't seem to match the documentation at all. (Are we missing a test here?)

    Thanks.
  • Chris Douglas at Apr 25, 2011 at 12:21 am

    On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
    Could someone actually take the branch and try to install from scratch?  i.e., not copy a pre-existing config.  I found a multitude of problems with 203 doing this, but haven't had a chance to file JIRAs for all of them.  (Pay attention to the log messages in particular). I'm not going to be able to do this for various reasons.
    Are the values in the default config broken and/or are some required
    settings undocumented? The setup guide is almost surely out of sync.
    Does the single-node setup still work? We should also test and
    document an upgrade from an existing 0.20.2 cluster.
    There are also a lot of places where hadoop-*-{core|hdfs|mapred} are referenced in the documentation, but since this release breaks with 0.20.{0-2}, all of those documentation references need to be fixed.
    Are you talking about the jar naming since maven? I found a couple
    places in the mapred-tutorial that use the old naming. Are there
    others?
    As it stands, I wouldn't want to use this release in production. In addition to the previously mentioned issues,  the job size unpredictability/regression with capacity scheduler is particularly disturbing.  The math we're seeing doesn't seem to match the documentation at all.  (Are we missing a test here?)
    The documentation has almost surely lagged behind the changes in the
    CS, particularly w.r.t. limits and what a single user can claim of the
    queue capacity. Can you file a JIRA w/ an example where the assigned
    capacity doesn't match what was expected? That should definitely be
    fixed. -C

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupcommon-dev @
categorieshadoop
postedApr 22, '11 at 11:31p
activeApr 25, '11 at 12:21a
posts3
users3
websitehadoop.apache.org...
irc#hadoop

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2023 Grokbase