If 2-0-stable is removed, couldn't we move 3-0-stable to 2-0-stable and make it consistent with every single other extension out there?
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Washington Luiz wrote:

Guys sorry about the confusion. But please use 3-0-stable branch. That's
the branch we created when adding new features to spree_i18n. I know it
sounds confusing but that's how it is, spree_i18n jumped from version 1 to
3. I've removed 2-0-stable because it really didn't have anything related
to the new spree_i18n project and doesn't work with Spree 2.0.
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 5:04:08 PM UTC-3, johanb wrote:


fwiw, I filed this issue today:

Seems we should use 3.0, or maybe you should talk to Washington about it.
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:09:47 AM UTC+2, Ryan Bigg wrote:

This seems very wrong... you shouldn't be using the 3-0-stable branch
because there isn't a 3.0 release of Spree out yet. That's a long way off!
You should be using the 2-0-stable branch, and that should work for Spree
2-0-stable and 2.0.x releases.

If it's not working, please file an issue on
https://github.com/spree/spree_i18n and provide the information asked
for in our Contributing Guidelines<https://github.com/spree/spree/tree/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Alex Coles wrote:

Hi Jörg,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Jörg wrote:
When setting up I18n for Spree 2.0.1 the spree_i18n locale files seem to be
Any ideas? Thanks a lot!
I believe I've hit a similar issue. From what I can tell, it appears
that you should in fact be using the 3-0-stable rather than 2-0-stable
branch of spree_i18n with Spree 2.0.0. This confused me as well (in
fact I posted a comment on the Spree blog here:





Ryan Bigg
Community Manager
Spree Commerce, Inc.

Search Discussions

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupspree-user @
postedJun 16, '13 at 6:27a
activeJun 16, '13 at 8:26a

2 users in discussion

Ryan Bigg: 1 post Jörg: 1 post



site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase