[salt-users] Human-supplied `Description` for states in addition to Salt-generated `Comment` in result output - why not?

Suppose I have a state in SLS file like this:

dummy_state:
     cmd.run:
         - name: echo nothing


If I run the state, the output will look something like this:

salt 'minion_id' state.sls dummy
minion_id:
----------
           ID: dummy_state
     Function: cmd.run
         Name: echo nothing
       Result: True
      Comment: Command "echo nothing" run
      Changes:
               ----------
               pid:
                   28198
               retcode:
                   0
               stderr:

               stdout:
                   nothing

Summary
------------
Succeeded: 1
Failed: 0
------------
Total: 1



Note the Salt-generated `Comment` key in the output. It definitively
clarifies what's going on, but it is not controlled by user (author of SLS).

It doesn't solve any technical issue, but it would be nice to have a
possibility to add some description (i.e. `desc` key) which will become
part of resulted output. For example:


dummy_state:
     cmd.run:

         - desc: run dummy command without side effect

         - name: echo nothing


The output of such state could be like this:

salt 'minion_id' state.sls dummy
minion_id:
----------
           ID: dummy_state
     Function: cmd.run
         Name: echo nothing
       Result: True

  Description: run dummy command without side effect

      Comment: Command "echo nothing" run
      Changes:
               ----------
               pid:
                   28198
               retcode:
                   0
               stderr:

               stdout:
                   nothing

Summary
------------
Succeeded: 1
Failed: 0
------------
Total: 1


Simple need and simple implementation.

There is always a way to look up state id in the SLS files and figure out
what's going on.
However, this simple feature makes reports save-able and read-able for
documenting/auditing point of view.
For example, to provide hints about tests run through Salt (i.e. in CI
platform), or appendix for some formal documents about site deployments
between vendor and customer, etc.

Any comments before I submit a feature request?