When I had namespaced routes (Engine::Application.routes.draw) in
routes.rb, I was unable to get past the "no such file or directory" errors
from apache. The request never got back to the application.
When I used global routes (Rails.application.routes.draw) in routes.rb, I
can not direct the request to the namespaced controller. I get
"uninitialized constant" with the non-namespaced controller name.
The Getting Started with Engines<http://guides.rubyonrails.org/engines.html>Rails Guide does not include information on deploying an application
containing engines.
The relevant portion of the apache configuration is:
<Directory /var/www/html/links>
Options -MultiViews
RailsBaseURI /links
RailsEnv staging
PassengerRuby
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p484/bin/ruby
</Directory>
/var/www/html/links is a symbolic link to the public directory of theOptions -MultiViews
RailsBaseURI /links
RailsEnv staging
PassengerRuby
/usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p484/bin/ruby
</Directory>
deployed application.
A solution to either problem (namespaced or non-namespaced) is acceptable.
A solution with namespaced routes is preferred.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/8a819090-444e-4610-941f-f09503eaf737%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.