I have three models, Users, Groups, and Roles. They are connected via
a join table that has user_id, group_id, and role_id on the same table.
A user is in a group, with a role. The same user can be in another
group with another (or the same) role.
So, the user model has a has_and_belongs_to_many :roles, and the role
model has a has_and_belongs_to_many :users, with the appropriate tags to
make it work.
With this, @user.roles will grab a list of all roles associated with
that user, and @role.users will grab all the users that have that role.
Duplicates are possible.
One interesting behavior, was that, if the user and the role model both
had a group_id column, then when @user.roles was called (and likewise
@role.users), it would grab the group_id from the join_table for each
role, instead of the group_id from users or roles. If I take out the
group_id from users and roles, then it does not appear when I call
This behavior is desirable, because then it lets me do things like,
to get the name of the role that the user has in group 1. Things like
So my question is, how can I get that functionality (grabbing the
group_id when going through the join table) without the group_id columns
in the user and role tables?
I've tried declaring group_id as attr_accessor :group_id for both user
and role, but that didn't work.
The most important thing is being able to maintain the behavior, that I
can call @user.roles.group_id, and @roles.user.group_id, with
group_id being grabbed from the join table. Any way to do that would
solve my problem.
Is there a way I can do it with definitions? like def
self.Role.group_id or something like that?
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.