|| at Feb 20, 2013 at 10:37 am
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:11:16 PM UTC+2, Rui Maciel wrote:
You are trying to argue against the correct outcome.
No, I'm can assure that I'm not. You should read top to bottom.
The numeric outcome is correct, float types are not the issue.
The mechanism by which one gets the displayed outcome is questionable:
float32 has to go as float64 in order to be processed, which results in
longer precision displayed.
It's easy for me to misunderstand your intentions, so I'd appreciate if
you'd keep out remarks which can be mistakenly read as flaming: "And no,
that site isn't broken either." or anything close to that.
I'm just not dealing well with this kind of interpretable messages.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.