FAQ
Is this okay for Go 1.1?

What about:
- the rand package?
- the nil pointer case?

Do you advise something?

https://codereview.appspot.com/8303043/

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Search Discussions

  • Brad Fitzpatrick at Apr 8, 2013 at 7:09 am
    Seems fine for 1.1, but I'm not concerned either way.

    If it's going to crash either way, we can crash with a nice error message.
    Or not.

    Likewise with nil. Your call.





    On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 12:05 AM, wrote:

    Is this okay for Go 1.1?

    What about:
    - the rand package?
    - the nil pointer case?

    Do you advise something?

    https://codereview.appspot.**com/8303043/<https://codereview.appspot.com/8303043/>
    --

    ---
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-dev" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupgolang-dev @
categoriesgo
postedApr 8, '13 at 7:06a
activeApr 8, '13 at 7:09a
posts2
users2
websitegolang.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase