FAQ
PTAL.


https://codereview.appspot.com/6903048/diff/18002/doc/go_spec.html
File doc/go_spec.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/6903048/diff/18002/doc/go_spec.html#newcode840
doc/go_spec.html:840: For instance, the maximum size of an array type
may be restricted by
On 2012/12/11 19:50:27, iant wrote:
On 2012/12/11 19:32:55, gri wrote:
On 2012/12/11 18:12:35, iant wrote:
But now you are back to not setting a lower bound. That was my
original
complaint, and rsc mentioned it also.
quoting rsc: "I think it would be fine not to set a lower bound and
say..."
(what I have written now).
Sorry, you're quite right, I did misread rsc.
But if we permit the implementation to have an upper bound I still
want a lower
bound.
I've left the restriction away now. If in doubt, leave it out. We can
always add it later if we find an acceptable phrasing.

Hopefully we cannot mostly agree on this CL.

https://codereview.appspot.com/6903048/

Search Discussions

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupgolang-dev @
categoriesgo
postedDec 12, '12 at 6:46a
activeDec 12, '12 at 7:13p
posts5
users3
websitegolang.org

3 users in discussion

Gri: 3 posts Iant: 1 post R: 1 post

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase