FAQ
Are there details anywhere for what a "good enough" version of XML would
look like, if someone were to embark on such a thing? It's of greatly
limited utility (relative to other encoders like JSON) as it stands, and
sometimes you have to talk to things that speak XML even though you'd much
rather be speaking JSON. :)
On 24 June 2012 16:29, Russ Cox wrote:

We had something like your patch, but it became clear pretty close to
Go 1 that it was not good enough and would need to be replaced. We
didn't have time to replace it but we did yank out the old one so that
we have the flexibility to put in a better one later. This is issue
2771.

Russ

Search Discussions

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupgolang-dev @
categoriesgo
postedSep 2, '12 at 1:54a
activeSep 2, '12 at 1:54a
posts1
users1
websitegolang.org

1 user in discussion

Mike Bell: 1 post

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase