Re: [golang-dev] Re: Duplicate darwin builders

On 1 September 2012 03:16, Russ Cox wrote:
I don't want to end up with the Chromium waterfall board where there
are so many columns each one is a pixel or two, all for tiny machine
variants. We've done okay with just having a decently recent Mac in
the list. We don't have Ubuntu and Debian and RedHat and so on either.

On Sep 3, 2012 3:32 PM, "Andrew Gerrand" wrote:
To be fair, OS X seems to be less stable (in their dev tool chain, at
least) than the Linuxes.

I don't know that "all the cats" are necessary, but it would be good
to have mountain lion and snow leopard represented. (Snow Leopard is
the last one to support 32-bit processors.)

On 04/09/2012, at 12:09, Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:

At least let's not yet upgrade any old cat yet. It's harder to find or build an old OS X.

If builder UI noise is the problem, that's fixable. If email spam is the problem, that's fixable.
On Sep 3, 2012 3:32 PM, "Andrew Gerrand" wrote:
To be fair, OS X seems to be less stable (in their dev tool chain, at
least) than the Linuxes.

I don't know that "all the cats" are necessary, but it would be good
to have mountain lion and snow leopard represented. (Snow Leopard is
the last one to support 32-bit processors.)