(cross-join), I observe all data going through 1 reducer.
I expected that when doing "A cross B", I'd get something like a mapper
for each A_i, that emits A_i joined with all B's.
I ended up loading all B's into memory, then emitting them via a
mapcatfn. This is equivalent, right? If so, does Cascalog just not have
the optimization that translates (cross-join) into this pattern?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cascalog-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.