FAQ
I have just done installation of 8.1.7.0 on a Compaq
Tru64 Unix box and applied 8.1.7.2 patch. There were no installation errors.
When I start svrmgrl I see a line "inst emulated pid=175364.......".

-->$ svrmgrlinst emulated pid=175364
va=0x11fffa358 pc=0x1205c0148 inst=0x327e0028

Oracle Server Manager Release 3.1.7.0.0 - Production

Copyright (c) 1997, 1999, Oracle Corporation.  All Rights
Reserved.

Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.7.2.0 - ProductionWith the
Partitioning optionJServer Release 8.1.7.2.0 - Production

SVRMGR> ^DServer Manager complete.


Any ideas?

Anand Prakash

Search Discussions

  • Hand, Michael T at Dec 3, 2001 at 7:51 pm
    Anand,

    I installed the same(?
    8.1.7.2.1) patch about 2 weeks ago on Tru64 5.1 and did not get this
    result.  However, I do remember this kind of result with a earlier upgrade
    to 8.0.x in the distant past.  I believe it is a verbose linking option
    with no negative impact.  Is svrmgrl the only executable responding like
    this.  If so, try relinking.

    Mike Hand
    Polaroid
    Corp.

    -----Original Message-----

    I have just done installation of 8.1.7.0
    on a Compaq Tru64 Unix box and applied 8.1.7.2 patch. There were no
    installation errors. When I start svrmgrl I see a line "inst emulated
    pid=175364.......".

    -->$ svrmgrlinst emulated pid=175364
    va=0x11fffa358 pc=0x1205c0148
    inst=0x327e0028

    Oracle Server Manager Release 3.1.7.0.0 -
    Production

    Copyright (c) 1997, 1999, Oracle Corporation.  All
    Rights Reserved.
  • Anand Prakash at Dec 3, 2001 at 8:52 pm
    Mike

    I found a note on metalink (124568.1) which explains the
    reason. Oracle 8.1.7.x products are not supported on chip prior to
    EV56.

    Thanks.
    Anand Prakash
    HANDM_at_polaroid.com 12/03/01 12:40PM
    Anand,

    I installed the same(?
    8.1.7.2.1) patch about 2 weeks ago on Tru64 5.1 and did not get this
    result.  However, I do remember this kind of result with a earlier upgrade
    to 8.0.x in the distant past.  I believe it is a verbose linking option
    with no negative impact.  Is svrmgrl the only executable responding like
    this.  If so, try relinking.

    Mike Hand
    Polaroid
    Corp.

    -----Original Message-----

    I have just done installation of 8.1.7.0
    on a Compaq Tru64 Unix box and applied 8.1.7.2 patch. There were no
    installation errors. When I start svrmgrl I see a line "inst emulated
    pid=175364.......".

    -->$ svrmgrlinst emulated pid=175364
    va=0x11fffa358 pc=0x1205c0148
    inst=0x327e0028

    Oracle Server Manager Release 3.1.7.0.0 -
    Production

    Copyright (c) 1997, 1999, Oracle Corporation.  All
    Rights Reserved.
  • Sunil_Nookala_at_Dell.com at Dec 3, 2001 at 9:22 pm
    Hello all,

    could someone please tell me why the procedure below (Author:Nick Butcher) takes less than a
    minute ona table with 50,000 rows
    and about 21 mins on a table with 235,000 rows??
    I have created a
    bigger rollback segment to take care of this, but no improvement.where
    should i be looking for bottlenecks??

    CREATE PROCUDURE DUPES_DEL  ASBEGIN

    LOOP DELETE from fms_test where row_id
    in(select min(rowid)   from

    fms_test   group by sku_num   having count
    (*) >1);  EXIT WHEN SQL%NOTFOUND END
    LOOP;    COMMIT;END;


    appreciate it.Sunil NookalaDellCorp.Austin,
    TX
  • Koivu, Lisa at Dec 3, 2001 at 9:39 pm
    Did you trace the statement?  Send a trace to the list.

    -----Original Message-----

    From:   Sunil_Nookala_at_Dell.com [SMTP:Sunil_Nookala_at_Dell.com]
    Sent:   Monday, December 03, 2001 4:10 PM
    To:     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

    Subject:        RE: Message at the start of svrmgrl

    Hello all,

    could someone please tell me why the procedure below (Author:Nick Butcher) takes less than a minute on
    a table with 50,000 rows and about 21 mins on a table with 235,000 rows??

    I have created a bigger rollback segment to take care of this, but no improvement.
    where should i be looking for bottlenecks??


    CREATE PROCUDURE DUPES_DEL  AS

    BEGIN


    LOOP

    DELETE from fms_test
    where row_id in(select min(rowid)
    from fms_test
    group by sku_num
    having count (*) >1);
    EXIT WHEN SQL%NOTFOUND

    END LOOP;


    COMMIT;

    END;



    appreciate it.
    Sunil Nookala
    DellCorp.
    Austin, TX
  • Nirmal Kumar Muthu Kumaran at Dec 4, 2001 at 8:22 am
    What are the new things on oracle 8.1.7.2.1 patch.....

    is't available on oracle downloads.......?

    I'm much interested to know "why should apply this patch".... is it for to rectify some bugs or something else...

    Rgds,
    Nirmal

    -----Original Message-----

    From:   Hand, Michael T [SMTP:HANDM_at_polaroid.com]
    Sent:   Monday, December 03, 2001 10:41 PM
    To:     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

    Subject:        RE: Message at the start of svrmgrl

    Anand,

    I installed the same(? 8.1.7.2.1) patch about 2 weeks ago on Tru64 5.1 and did not get this result.  However, I do remember this kind of result with a earlier upgrade to 8.0.x in the distant past.  I believe it is a verbose linking option with no negative impact.  Is svrmgrl the only executable responding like this.  If so, try relinking.


    Mike Hand
    Polaroid Corp.

    -----Original Message-----


    I have just done installation of 8.1.7.0 on a Compaq Tru64 Unix box and applied 8.1.7.2 patch. There were no installation errors. When I start svrmgrl I see a line "inst emulated pid=175364.......".


    -->$ svrmgrl
    inst emulated pid=175364 va=0x11fffa358 pc=0x1205c0148 inst=0x327e0028

    Oracle Server Manager Release 3.1.7.0.0 - Production

    Copyright (c) 1997, 1999, Oracle Corporation.  All Rights Reserved.

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
grouporacle-l @
categoriesoracle
postedDec 3, '01 at 7:13p
activeDec 4, '01 at 8:22a
posts6
users5
websiteoracle.com

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase