[dojo-contributors] 1.7+ docs

Thank you, I'm glad to see this, however I don't seem to have access to
most of these docs. Can these be made publicly accessible?

A couple comments on what is accessible though:
* Shouldn't the widget gallery/showcase be integrated into the package
repository viewer? Having packages/widgets in both the repository and
the showcase seems like it would further exacerbate user's complaints
about Dojo stuff being too scattered and difficult to find. It would be
great to be able to see a demo of widgets and download/install them from
one place.
* Dojo 2.0 is not when packages are introduced, they are when DojoX is
eliminated. Packages need to be created well before then. In fact, we
should begin migrating to DojoX packages right now (actually Dojo and
Dijit are already valid packages). More specifically, I would really
like to see some of the key packages moved to github projects as soon as
possible to start leveraging the features there. Can we get a
dojo-mobile, gfx, and charting github projects started?

Should we consider this document to be the central "wiki" for future
Dojo plans, proposals, etc.? If so, I'll add in the information about
different projects with code possibly to be merged into Dojo, and design
plans for that.
Thanks,
Kris

Along the same lines, what is the relationship between the package
metadata spec and the widget metadata? For that matter, does it make
sense to follow an existing specification like openajax metadata or
shindig? An i18n scheme for the metadata would also be very valuable,
I think.
+1

-Adam

Chris, can you change the links to be the view links rather than the edit
links? For example, Evan's document should be the publicly accessible
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1OwgSJGNfh6jzAjHvagWj74wBxPmyiZBGishy5F96G48,
not the link with /edit?... in it.

Also, everyone should change their document sharing settings to "anyone with
link", not private. ("Share" drop down button in the upper right)


2011/2/9 Chris Mitchell <ccmitchellusa at gmail.com>

will do!

-chris

All the non-private doc links are now "view" links available to everyone.
-Chris

Thanks Chris for gathering all of this in a centralized place!

About charting touch events
(
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?idQTmxCkqYBX-cM6tim8zIaOb3px5KkjrvbhGct7MRww
)

I plan to be working on 2. (pan) and 4. (pinch) shortly. If there is
interest on 3. I can see what I can do as well.

1. (pie rotation) is visually nice however I'm not really sure there is a
real use-case behind it?

Other touch interactions that might be useful:

- double tap, depending on the initial state (already zoomed or not): fit
the chart data window to chart dimension or zoom it by a predefined factor.
- single touch : data indicator on touch point (may be similar to 5. in the
spec)
- double touch: data indicator on chart trend (%) between touch 1 and 2.
- on swipe alternatively to 3. you might also want to go over the various
series of a given chart.

I've put the comments of my previous mail and a proposal around charting for
mobile in that document:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WM1UeXGZKgUSzL94TzRbr3dNEHiMzSJvy7pZep8yyAw/edit?hl=fr&authkey=CL7IjbIM

Chris as I don't appear to have editing rights on the index document can you
add it to it?

Thanks,

Here is a document for the proposal of changes on the dojox Gauges

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gq1HLjMR5pj03yde4t5Z86kexZP5atCae1Zo-opIMXQ/edit?hl=fr&authkey=CNKb0fwG#

Chris , just like the document of Christophe, it will have to be added to
the index file.

Thanks

Emmanuel Tissandier


2011/2/10 Christophe Jolif <cjolif at gmail.com>

Thanks for the links, I've added these to the doc index.
-Chris

2011/2/10 Emmanuel Tissandier <etissandier at gmail.com>