FAQ
v133 of cf-release came out recently and changed the way that some jobs
can/cannot be colocated. v133 does not seem to affect any deployment that
does not use colocation of jobs.

I've released bosh-cloudfoundry 0.7.0.alpha.5 to include v133 and templates
to match.

gem install bosh-cloudfoundry --pre
bosh prepare cf
bosh create cf

If you are managing you're own deployments using colocation, perhaps
compare the v132 & v133 templates
https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/bosh-cloudfoundry/tree/v0.7/templatesto
see how I moved job templates around to get v133 to work in the
"medium"
deployment size.

"small" or "solo" sized deployments are still not possible with v133 (not
all jobs can be colocated together yet).

Nic

--
Dr Nic Williams
Stark & Wayne LLC - consultancy for Cloud Foundry users
http://drnicwilliams.com
http://starkandwayne.com
cell +1 (415) 860-2185
twitter @drnic

Search Discussions

  • Dr Nic Williams at Jul 16, 2013 at 7:01 pm
    The v133 deployment adds one VM to the "medium" cluster. It looks like:

    +-----------+---------+---------------+-------------------------------+
    Job/index | State | Resource Pool | IPs |
    +-----------+---------+---------------+-------------------------------+
    api/0 | running | medium | 10.144.78.121, 54.225.102.129 |
    core/0 | running | medium | 10.147.198.134 |
    data/0 | running | small | 10.170.85.8 |
    dea/0 | running | small | 10.28.207.36 |
    uaa/0 | running | small | 10.235.46.176 |
    +-----------+---------+---------------+-------------------------------+



    On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Dr Nic Williams
    wrote:
    v133 of cf-release came out recently and changed the way that some jobs
    can/cannot be colocated. v133 does not seem to affect any deployment that
    does not use colocation of jobs.

    I've released bosh-cloudfoundry 0.7.0.alpha.5 to include v133 and
    templates to match.

    gem install bosh-cloudfoundry --pre
    bosh prepare cf
    bosh create cf

    If you are managing you're own deployments using colocation, perhaps
    compare the v132 & v133 templates
    https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/bosh-cloudfoundry/tree/v0.7/templatesto see how I moved job templates around to get v133 to work in the "medium"
    deployment size.

    "small" or "solo" sized deployments are still not possible with v133 (not
    all jobs can be colocated together yet).

    Nic

    --
    Dr Nic Williams
    Stark & Wayne LLC - consultancy for Cloud Foundry users
    http://drnicwilliams.com
    http://starkandwayne.com
    cell +1 (415) 860-2185
    twitter @drnic


    --
    Dr Nic Williams
    Stark & Wayne LLC - consultancy for Cloud Foundry users
    http://drnicwilliams.com
    http://starkandwayne.com
    cell +1 (415) 860-2185
    twitter @drnic
  • Dr Nic Williams at Jul 16, 2013 at 7:02 pm
    Changing "api" to be a small (it only has gorouter & ccng).


    On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Dr Nic Williams
    wrote:
    The v133 deployment adds one VM to the "medium" cluster. It looks like:

    +-----------+---------+---------------+-------------------------------+
    Job/index | State | Resource Pool | IPs |
    +-----------+---------+---------------+-------------------------------+
    api/0 | running | medium | 10.144.78.121, 54.225.102.129 |
    core/0 | running | medium | 10.147.198.134 |
    data/0 | running | small | 10.170.85.8 |
    dea/0 | running | small | 10.28.207.36 |
    uaa/0 | running | small | 10.235.46.176 |
    +-----------+---------+---------------+-------------------------------+



    On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Dr Nic Williams <drnicwilliams@gmail.com
    wrote:
    v133 of cf-release came out recently and changed the way that some jobs
    can/cannot be colocated. v133 does not seem to affect any deployment that
    does not use colocation of jobs.

    I've released bosh-cloudfoundry 0.7.0.alpha.5 to include v133 and
    templates to match.

    gem install bosh-cloudfoundry --pre
    bosh prepare cf
    bosh create cf

    If you are managing you're own deployments using colocation, perhaps
    compare the v132 & v133 templates
    https://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/bosh-cloudfoundry/tree/v0.7/templatesto see how I moved job templates around to get v133 to work in the "medium"
    deployment size.

    "small" or "solo" sized deployments are still not possible with v133 (not
    all jobs can be colocated together yet).

    Nic

    --
    Dr Nic Williams
    Stark & Wayne LLC - consultancy for Cloud Foundry users
    http://drnicwilliams.com
    http://starkandwayne.com
    cell +1 (415) 860-2185
    twitter @drnic


    --
    Dr Nic Williams
    Stark & Wayne LLC - consultancy for Cloud Foundry users
    http://drnicwilliams.com
    http://starkandwayne.com
    cell +1 (415) 860-2185
    twitter @drnic


    --
    Dr Nic Williams
    Stark & Wayne LLC - consultancy for Cloud Foundry users
    http://drnicwilliams.com
    http://starkandwayne.com
    cell +1 (415) 860-2185
    twitter @drnic

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupvcap-dev @
postedJul 16, '13 at 6:53p
activeJul 16, '13 at 7:02p
posts3
users1

1 user in discussion

Dr Nic Williams: 3 posts

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase