[vcap-dev] Cloud Foundry Roadmap (Feb 2013)

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:10 PM, wrote:

We published our roadmap on our 'beta' documentation site.

http://cloudfoundry.github.com/docs/roadmap.html

This is a milestone for two reasons. It is the first time (to this PM's
knowledge) we have committed to sharing a public roadmap in the form of a
living / breathing document. It also gives our entire team a signal that
they can openly discuss and embrace change with our community without
worrying about speaking out of turn. We want to encourage communication,
work in the sunlight, and blur the distinction between people paid to work
on Cloud Foundry, people paid to implement it, and people who are involved
'just because.'

Bring on the questions and thanks so much.

Matt

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Dr Nic Williams wrote:
Thanks Matt & others for sharing the planned future!




--
Dr Nic Williams
Stark & Wayne LLC - consultancy for Cloud Foundry users
http://drnicwilliams.com
http://starkandwayne.com
cell +1 (415) 860-2185
twitter @drnic

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Alexis Richardson wrote:

Very cool - well done guys.
a
work
involved

On Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:10:41 PM UTC-7, mre...@rbcon.com wrote:

We published our roadmap on our 'beta' documentation site.

http://cloudfoundry.github.com/docs/roadmap.html

This is a milestone for two reasons. It is the first time (to this PM's
knowledge) we have committed to sharing a public roadmap in the form of a
living / breathing document. It also gives our entire team a signal that
they can openly discuss and embrace change with our community without
worrying about speaking out of turn. We want to encourage communication,
work in the sunlight, and blur the distinction between people paid to work
on Cloud Foundry, people paid to implement it, and people who are involved
'just because.'

Bring on the questions and thanks so much.

Matt

On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Mike Heath wrote:

The Team Edition Web Portal says that it's an "Enterprise Offering". What does that mean by "Enterprise Offering?" Does mean it's something that's going to be for enterprises to use on cloudfoundry.com or is that something that private deploys of CF will be able to buy or will it be part of the open source offering?

-Mike


On Thursday, February 7, 2013 2:10:41 PM UTC-7, mre...@rbcon.com wrote:
We published our roadmap on our 'beta' documentation site.

http://cloudfoundry.github.com/docs/roadmap.html

This is a milestone for two reasons. It is the first time (to this PM's knowledge) we have committed to sharing a public roadmap in the form of a living / breathing document. It also gives our entire team a signal that they can openly discuss and embrace change with our community without worrying about speaking out of turn. We want to encourage communication, work in the sunlight, and blur the distinction between people paid to work on Cloud Foundry, people paid to implement it, and people who are involved 'just because.'

Bring on the questions and thanks so much.

Matt

On Thursday, February 7, 2013 5:57:41 PM UTC-8, James Bayer wrote:

It is initially being designed for cloudfoundry.com and will contain some
proprietary information that is only for our billing system and not
appropriate for open source.

We would also like to use the web portal with private installations, but
that is likely to be held back only for customers that sign up for a
commercial subscription offering. We have nothing more to announce or say
about that at this time, it's all TBD.

Thank you,

James Bayer


On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Mike Heath <elc...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
wrote:

The Team Edition Web Portal says that it's an "Enterprise Offering". What
does that mean by "Enterprise Offering?" Does mean it's something that's
going to be for enterprises to use on cloudfoundry.com or is that
something that private deploys of CF will be able to buy or will it be part
of the open source offering?

-Mike

On Thursday, February 7, 2013, shair khan wrote:

Thanks James for your reply.

However, I do not understand your comment "We would also like to use the
web portal with private installation". Will this be part of
cloudfoundry.com?

On Feb 7, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Dr Nic Williams wrote:

I think he means the wonderful world of customers who run CF on their own hardware/cloud accounts.

--
Dr Nic Williams
Stark & Wayne LLC - consultancy for Cloud Foundry users
http://drnicwilliams.com
http://starkandwayne.com
cell +1 (415) 860-2185
twitter @drnic

On Thursday, February 7, 2013 4:10:41 PM UTC-5, mre...@rbcon.com wrote:

We published our roadmap on our 'beta' documentation site.

http://cloudfoundry.github.com/docs/roadmap.html

This is a milestone for two reasons. It is the first time (to this PM's
knowledge) we have committed to sharing a public roadmap in the form of a
living / breathing document. It also gives our entire team a signal that
they can openly discuss and embrace change with our community without
worrying about speaking out of turn. We want to encourage communication,
work in the sunlight, and blur the distinction between people paid to work
on Cloud Foundry, people paid to implement it, and people who are involved
'just because.'

Bring on the questions and thanks so much.

Matt

On Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:10:41 UTC, mre...@rbcon.com wrote:

We published our roadmap on our 'beta' documentation site.

http://cloudfoundry.github.com/docs/roadmap.html

This is a milestone for two reasons. It is the first time (to this PM's
knowledge) we have committed to sharing a public roadmap in the form of a
living / breathing document. It also gives our entire team a signal that
they can openly discuss and embrace change with our community without
worrying about speaking out of turn. We want to encourage communication,
work in the sunlight, and blur the distinction between people paid to work
on Cloud Foundry, people paid to implement it, and people who are involved
'just because.'

Bring on the questions and thanks so much.

Matt

On Thursday, February 7, 2013 3:10:41 PM UTC-6, mre...@rbcon.com wrote:

We published our roadmap on our 'beta' documentation site.

http://cloudfoundry.github.com/docs/roadmap.html

This is a milestone for two reasons. It is the first time (to this PM's
knowledge) we have committed to sharing a public roadmap in the form of a
living / breathing document. It also gives our entire team a signal that
they can openly discuss and embrace change with our community without
worrying about speaking out of turn. We want to encourage communication,
work in the sunlight, and blur the distinction between people paid to work
on Cloud Foundry, people paid to implement it, and people who are involved
'just because.'

Bring on the questions and thanks so much.

Matt

On Feb 10, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Egle wrote:

Thank you for sharing this. I have a question about enterprise offering- can you share more what that is going to look like? Also, does it mean that cloudfoundry.com is not going to be in beta anymore?

Thank you!

-Egle

On Sunday, February 10, 2013 10:16:26 PM UTC-6, Matt Reider wrote:

It will look pretty, but the aesthetics aren't very important. What's
important is that there will be interfaces for managing organizations,
applications, users, roles, and such.

And yes, CF.com will be out of beta - either in conjunction with its
shiny new interface, or shortly thereafter.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 10, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Egle <anyst...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
wrote:

Thank you for sharing this. I have a question about enterprise offering-
can you share more what that is going to look like? Also, does it mean that
cloudfoundry.com is not going to be in beta anymore?

Thank you!

-Egle

On Sunday, February 10, 2013 9:01:43 PM UTC-8, Egle wrote:

Thanks, I was indeed not asking about the aesthetics :). Do you have
any definite time lines for going out of beta? I guess the answer is no,
but I can ask, right? :D