FAQ

On 01/29/2015 09:49 AM, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
Hi Jim,
On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:37, Jim Perrin wrote:


On 01/29/2015 04:04 AM, Matthias Schroeder wrote:
Hi guys,

I noticed that golang-github-gorilla-mux 0-0.15.git136d54f.el7_0 is in the ?updates' and in the ?extras' repo. Older versions where only in ?extras?. Is that a conscious change of policy, or did something go wrong with the routing of that version?

This change was done to mirror the upstream repo structure. We're unsure
why it was done upstream, but for us it was an intentional change to
stay consistent.
OK, thanks for the info. Since I should have check upstream repos as well?

To be more clear .. initially in RHEL 7.0, golang-github-gorilla-mux was
only in RHEL extras as a build requirement for docker, also in only in
RHEL extras.


The latest release of golang-github-gorilla-mux was released instead
into "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7)".


https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0081.html


I have no idea why it was released into there, but we did it based on
their release.


When this happens, we will roll these type of packages into updates ..
but we will also keep them in extras.




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20150202/714c980e/attachment.sig>

Search Discussions

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupcentos-devel @
categoriescentos
postedFeb 2, '15 at 1:19p
activeFeb 2, '15 at 1:19p
posts1
users1
websitecentos.org
irc#centos

1 user in discussion

Johnny Hughes: 1 post

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase