FAQ
I created a bug report - not sure if it is in the right category and
thought someone should be made aware of it, so just posting the link
to the list here

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?idI46

Greg

Search Discussions

  • R P Herrold at Jul 11, 2011 at 3:24 pm

    On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Greg Swallow wrote:

    I created a bug report - not sure if it is in the right category and
    thought someone should be made aware of it, so just posting the link
    to the list here

    http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?idI46
    I read ALL new bugs, as they are filed

    -- Russ herrold
  • Nickos H at Jul 11, 2011 at 5:01 pm
    I think there are missing these files from centos6:

    /usr/lib/libpgport.a

    /usr/lib64/libpgport.a

    --Nikos Hatzopoulos


    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110711/91b7e96f/attachment.html
  • Manuel Wolfshant at Jul 11, 2011 at 5:26 pm

    On 07/12/2011 12:01 AM, Nickos H wrote:
    I think there are missing these files from centos6:

    /usr/lib/libpgport.a
    /usr/lib64/libpgport.a
    which packages should provide those files ?
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110712/39979edd/attachment.html
  • R P Herrold at Jul 11, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
    On 07/12/2011 12:01 AM, Nickos H wrote:
    I think there are missing these files from centos6:

    /usr/lib/libpgport.a
    /usr/lib64/libpgport.a
    which packages should provide those files ?
    More to the point for CentOS purposes, what package from
    upstream, in its version 6 enterprise product built from
    publicly available SRPMs, presently provides such?

    That some third party may expect such libraries to be present
    that form is an indication that they are not 'keeping up' as
    there has been a campaign to extrerminate .a and .la files on
    the Fedira front for several yaars now, and this is probably a
    collateral casualty to such actions. If such, the venue for
    such reports would https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ or the third
    party's tracker

    -- Russ herrold
  • Nickos H at Jul 11, 2011 at 6:41 pm
    the
    /lib/libpgport.a

    changed name to
    /lib/libpg.so

    I don't care about if it is going to be a static link or a shared link
    I saw I library that does exist in centos 5 and does not in centos 6
    if this is it we need to change the link method to this library

    can anybody validate that this is the correct library before we change the link option
    to this library, I am trying to compile gdal for elgis community, we just stuck to that

    this is the package
    postgresql-devel-8.4.7-1.el6_0.1.x86_64

    --Nikos Hatzopoulos


    --- ???? ????., 12/07/11, ?/? R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> ??????:

    ???: R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com>
    ????: [CentOS-devel] centos6 postgres static libraries
    ????: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
    ??????????: ?????, 12 ??????? 2011, 0:33
    On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
    On 07/12/2011 12:01 AM, Nickos H wrote:
    I think there are missing these files from centos6:

    /usr/lib/libpgport.a
    /usr/lib64/libpgport.a
    which packages should provide those files ?
    More to the point for CentOS purposes, what package from
    upstream, in its version 6 enterprise product built from
    publicly available SRPMs, presently provides such?

    That some third party may expect such libraries to be present
    that form is an indication that they are not 'keeping up' as
    there has been a campaign to extrerminate .a and .la files on
    the Fedira front for several yaars now, and this is probably a
    collateral casualty to such actions.? If such, the venue for
    such reports would https://bugzilla.redhat.com/? or the third
    party's tracker

    -- Russ herrold
    _______________________________________________
    CentOS-devel mailing list
    CentOS-devel at centos.org
    http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110711/47031852/attachment.html
  • Manuel Wolfshant at Jul 11, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    On 07/12/2011 01:41 AM, Nickos H wrote:
    the
    /lib/libpgport.a

    changed name to
    /lib/libpg.so

    I don't care about if it is going to be a static link or a shared link
    I saw I library that does exist in centos 5 and does not in centos 6
    The correct topic to discuss here is "does this particular library exist
    in RHEL 6 and does not exist in CentOS 6?". Changes between major
    releases , as imposed by RHEL, are not really a topic for this list, as,
    as you must know, CentOS tries maintain 100% binary compatibility with
    RHEL's binary packages.

    if this is it we need to change the link method to this library

    can anybody validate that this is the correct library before we change
    the link option
    to this library, I am trying to compile gdal for elgis community, we
    just stuck to that

    this is the package
    postgresql-devel-8.4.7-1.el6_0.1.x86_64
    If RHEL decided to change the name of the library/libraries then
    probably you should follow their trend and change the configuration
    options of whatever software you try to build.
    As a sidenote, your initial message mentioned /usr/lib/libpgport.a not
    /lib/libpgport.a.
    And also, you either make confusions between static and dynamic libs or
    you forgot to explain something. As an observation, it is nicer for your
    users to use dynamic libs wherever possible.

    manuel
  • Nickos H at Jul 11, 2011 at 7:55 pm
    i think they removed this library from postgres

    https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11346

    I compiled it without this library and seems to be ok

    --Nikos

    --- ???? ????., 12/07/11, ?/? Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> ??????:

    ???: Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>
    ????: Re: [CentOS-devel] centos6 postgres static libraries
    ????: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
    ??????????: ?????, 12 ??????? 2011, 1:50
    On 07/12/2011 01:41 AM, Nickos H wrote:
    the
    /lib/libpgport.a

    changed name to
    /lib/libpg.so

    I don't care about if it is going to be a static link or a shared link
    I saw I library that does exist in centos 5 and does not in centos 6
    The correct topic to discuss here is "does this particular library exist
    in RHEL 6 and does not exist in CentOS 6?". Changes between major
    releases , as imposed by RHEL, are not really a topic for this list, as,
    as you must know, CentOS tries maintain 100% binary compatibility with
    RHEL's binary packages.

    if this is it we need to change the link method to this library

    can anybody validate that this is the correct library before we change
    the link option
    to this library, I am trying to compile gdal for elgis community, we
    just stuck to that

    this is the package
    postgresql-devel-8.4.7-1.el6_0.1.x86_64
    If RHEL decided to change the name of the library/libraries then
    probably you should follow their trend and change the configuration
    options of whatever software you try to build.
    As a sidenote, your initial message mentioned /usr/lib/libpgport.a not
    /lib/libpgport.a.
    And also, you either make confusions between static and dynamic libs or
    you forgot to explain something. As an observation, it is nicer for your
    users to use dynamic libs wherever possible.

    ? ???manuel

    _______________________________________________
    CentOS-devel mailing list
    CentOS-devel at centos.org
    http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110712/b5d2e84c/attachment.html
  • Nickos H at Jul 13, 2011 at 7:46 pm
    these packages are missing from centos:

    qt-mobility-1.1.3-2.el6.src.rpm
    qtwebkit-2.1.1-1.el6.src.rpm

    --Nikos Hatzopoulos

    --- ???? ????., 12/07/11, ?/? Nickos H <nickosss02 at yahoo.gr> ??????:

    ???: Nickos H <nickosss02 at yahoo.gr>
    ????: Re: [CentOS-devel] centos6 postgres static libraries
    ????: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
    ??????????: ?????, 12 ??????? 2011, 2:55

    i think they removed this library from postgres

    https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11346

    I compiled it without this library and seems to be ok

    --Nikos

    --- ???? ????., 12/07/11, ?/? Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> ??????:

    ???: Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>
    ????: Re: [CentOS-devel] centos6 postgres static libraries
    ????: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
    ??????????: ?????, 12 ??????? 2011, 1:50
    On 07/12/2011 01:41 AM, Nickos H wrote:
    the
    /lib/libpgport.a

    changed name to
    /lib/libpg.so

    I don't care about if it
    is going to be a static link or a shared link
    I saw I library that does exist in centos 5 and does not in centos 6
    The correct topic to discuss here is "does this particular library exist
    in RHEL 6 and does not exist in CentOS 6?". Changes between major
    releases , as imposed by RHEL, are not really a topic for this list, as,
    as you must know, CentOS tries maintain 100% binary compatibility with
    RHEL's binary packages.

    if this is it we need to change the link method to this library

    can anybody validate that this is the correct library before we change
    the link option
    to this library, I am trying to compile gdal for elgis community, we
    just stuck to that

    this is the package
    postgresql-devel-8.4.7-1.el6_0.1.x86_64
    If RHEL decided to change the name of the library/libraries then
    probably you should follow their trend and
    change the configuration
    options of whatever software you try to build.
    As a sidenote, your initial message mentioned /usr/lib/libpgport.a not
    /lib/libpgport.a.
    And also, you either make confusions between static and dynamic libs or
    you forgot to explain something. As an observation, it is nicer for your
    users to use dynamic libs wherever possible.

    ? ???manuel

    _______________________________________________
    CentOS-devel mailing list
    CentOS-devel at centos.org
    http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

    -----????????? ?????????-----

    _______________________________________________
    CentOS-devel mailing list
    CentOS-devel at centos.org
    http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110714/2490fff3/attachment.html
  • Manuel Wolfshant at Jul 13, 2011 at 7:56 pm

    On 07/14/2011 02:46 AM, Nickos H wrote:
    these packages are missing from centos:

    qt-mobility-1.1.3-2.el6.src.rpm
    qtwebkit-2.1.1-1.el6.src.rpm
    Please be as kind as to point us to the link from
    ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ where these packages
    are available. I cannot see them in any of the 6* directories.


    Manuel
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110714/52e50784/attachment.html
  • R P Herrold at Jul 13, 2011 at 8:17 pm

    On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:

    qt-mobility-1.1.3-2.el6.src.rpm
    qtwebkit-2.1.1-1.el6.src.rpm
    Please be as kind as to point us to the link from
    ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ where these packages are
    available. I cannot see them in any of the 6* directories.
    my local mirror shows the former in F13, 14, 15, and rawhide,
    and the latter only in rawhide, but with different VR's

    -- Russ herrold
  • Scott Dowdle at Jul 13, 2011 at 11:37 pm
    Greetings,
    ----- Original Message -----
    these packages are missing from centos:

    qt-mobility-1.1.3-2.el6.src.rpm
    qtwebkit-2.1.1-1.el6.src.rpm
    Those appear to be EPEL packages. Perhaps you've heard of EPEL?

    http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/6/SRPMS/repoview/letter_q.group.html

    TYL,
    --
    Scott Dowdle
    704 Church Street
    Belgrade, MT 59714
    (406)388-0827 [home]
    (406)994-3931 [work]
  • Nickos H at Jul 14, 2011 at 12:45 pm
    i didn't know redhat was supporting epel:
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?ide1521

    --Nikos

    --- ???? ???., 14/07/11, ?/? Scott Dowdle <dowdle at montanalinux.org> ??????:

    ???: Scott Dowdle <dowdle at montanalinux.org>
    ????: Re: [CentOS-devel] centos6 postgres static libraries
    ????: "The CentOS developers mailing list." <centos-devel at centos.org>
    ??????????: ??????, 14 ??????? 2011, 6:37

    Greetings,
    ----- Original Message -----
    these packages are missing from centos:

    qt-mobility-1.1.3-2.el6.src.rpm
    qtwebkit-2.1.1-1.el6.src.rpm
    Those appear to be EPEL packages.? Perhaps you've heard of EPEL?

    http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/6/SRPMS/repoview/letter_q.group.html

    TYL,
    --
    Scott Dowdle
    704 Church Street
    Belgrade, MT 59714
    (406)388-0827 [home]
    (406)994-3931 [work]
    _______________________________________________
    CentOS-devel mailing list
    CentOS-devel at centos.org
    http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110714/0b8c264d/attachment.html
  • Jeff Sheltren at Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 pm
    2011/7/14 Nickos H <nickosss02 at yahoo.gr>
    i didn't know redhat was supporting epel:
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?ide1521

    --Nikos
    EPEL is under the Fedora project umbrella meaning it uses resources such as
    RH bugzilla for bugs, package requests, etc

    The packages you mentioned are part of EPEL and not part of RHEL proper.
    Packages in EPEL are not going to be pulled into the core CentOS distro --
    the only place you *might* see overlap would be in the CentOS extras repo,
    but for packages such as these I wouldn't expect them to be in CentOS extras
    either.

    -Jeff
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110714/b5005e56/attachment.html

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
Discussion Overview
groupcentos-devel @
categoriescentos
postedJul 11, '11 at 3:10a
activeJul 14, '11 at 12:47p
posts14
users6
websitecentos.org
irc#centos

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase