On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:35:40PM +0200, "C. Bergström" wrote:

Here's more or less what I've collected... [..]
10) Did I miss something..
I suppose my RFE for two-level ZFS should be included, unless nobody
intends to attach a ZFS file server to a SAN with ZFS on application

-Gary Mills- -Unix Support- -U of M Academic Computing and
Although it seems your idea fell on a lot of deaf ears, I personally think
it's a great one. It would give people a reason to use Solaris as their
server OS of choice as well as their fileserver/storage appliance. It would
also give them something NetApp doesn't have, instead of a bunch of me-too's
(no, we don't need to start a flame-fest, it's my opinion, years of reading
this list haven't changed it). As it stands, either you put your workload
where the disks are, or you're wasting disk doing raid twice.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/osunix-dev/attachments/20090304/00f04eaa/attachment.htm

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts


Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 10 of 10 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouposunix-dev @
postedMar 3, '09 at 9:35p
activeMar 4, '09 at 4:53p



site design / logo © 2023 Grokbase