FAQ
As there're already several applications in the SQLite:: namespace,
it might be better to use (DBD::?)SQLite::Extension:: for the ones
to be loaded via load_extension(), and (DBD::?)SQLite::Module::
(or whatever) for the ones that adds a customized callback etc.

Kenichi
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:52:37 +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:

Now that we've got a number of integration points available for
feeding code into SQLite's internals, I'm wondering if we should
consider some form of blessed or recommended namespace for people to
write these extensions in.

Are we just going to recommend SQLite:: or does anyone have alternatives?

Adam K

_______________________________________________
DBD-SQLite mailing list
DBD-SQLite@lists.scsys.co.uk
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbd-sqlite

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 2 of 7 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupdbd-sqlite @
postedAug 14, '09 at 11:52a
activeAug 14, '09 at 10:59p
posts7
users6
websiteshadowcat.co.uk

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase