On 9/8/2015 6:19 PM, Cody Piersall wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<PointedEars at web.de wrote:
Cody Piersall wrote:
Please respond to the list as well as the person you're actually
to. It works out better for everyone that way. (You should just
have to
"reply all" instead of "reply").

[Reply] should send the reply to the list.

?Better? as in ?getting/reading/downloading the same message *twice*??

The rule of thumb is: write here, read here.
Some people email the list, but aren't subscribed to it. So I guess a
better rule is to just reply-to-all for the OP?

Please no, not as a routine. I intentionally read python-list as a
newsgroup via gmane.news.org so I can pick messages as I feel like
without my mailbox being flooded. Anyone who want to read responses to
something they send can do so via gmane. Also, [Reply All] tends to
collect multiple CC names, and most people don't have the curtesy to
properly prune it.

Terry Jan Reedy

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts


Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 38 of 44 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppython-list @
postedSep 3, '15 at 10:20p
activeSep 9, '15 at 8:16a



site design / logo © 2018 Grokbase