"Bob Gailer" <bgailer at alum.rpi.edu> wrote in message
news:mailman.1063223955.7295.python-list at python.org...
At 01:40 PM 9/10/2003, achrist at easystreet.com wrote:
The yield statement looks to be a big step toward some kind of
lightweight concurrency-oriented programming in python. Is there
any similarly nice way to do the opposite of yield, just sit around
(perhaps in the middle of a loop) and wait until some other routine
(unknown to the waiting module) hurls a value in?

Perhaps a new Python statement "suck"?
Oh come on, now, just because Java does it...

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts


Follow ups

Related Discussions



site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase