FAQ

Fernando P?rez wrote:
[snipped]

Why don't you submit it as a patch? Just go to sourceforge and put it in.
That's how python gets better...
Because I think that the tokenizer solution is too slow. Below are shown
some test
results that are claiming, that the tokenizer version runs over 7 times
slower than the
original. What do you think? Should I suggest a patch?

Python 2.2 (#28, Dec 21 2001, 12:21:22) [MSC 32 bit (Intel)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import profile, inspect, inspect2, cgi
profile.run("inspect.findsource(cgi.FormContent)")
138 function calls (134 primitive calls) in 0.327 CPU seconds

Ordered by: standard name

ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
1 0.001 0.001 0.200 0.200 <string>:1(?)
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 inspect.py:279(getfile)
1 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002
inspect.py:318(getsourcefile)
2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 inspect.py:33(ismodule)
1 0.159 0.159 0.198 0.198 inspect.py:368(findsource)
2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 inspect.py:41(isclass)
1 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 ntpath.py:244(exists)
1 0.127 0.127 0.327 0.327
profile:0(inspect.findsource(cgi
.FormContent))
0 0.000 0.000 profile:0(profiler)
1 0.000 0.000 0.037 0.037 sre.py:176(compile)
1 0.000 0.000 0.036 0.036 sre.py:215(_compile)
2 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000
sre_compile.py:145(_compile_charse
t)
2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
sre_compile.py:174(_optimize_chars
et)
3/1 0.018 0.006 0.020 0.020
sre_compile.py:21(_compile)
2 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000
sre_compile.py:293(_simple)
1 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.002
sre_compile.py:300(_compile_info)
1 0.000 0.000 0.022 0.022 sre_compile.py:409(_code)
1 0.000 0.000 0.036 0.036
sre_compile.py:424(compile)
8 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_parse.py:133(__len__)
10 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
sre_parse.py:137(__getitem__)
2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
sre_parse.py:139(__setitem__)
2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
sre_parse.py:141(__getslice__)
20 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.000 sre_parse.py:145(append)
5/3 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.001 sre_parse.py:147(getwidth)
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_parse.py:183(__init__)
25 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.000 sre_parse.py:187(__next)
3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_parse.py:200(match)
24 0.003 0.000 0.005 0.000 sre_parse.py:206(get)
3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_parse.py:269(_escape)
1 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.013
sre_parse.py:313(_parse_sub)
1 0.006 0.006 0.013 0.013 sre_parse.py:368(_parse)
1 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.014 sre_parse.py:613(parse)
1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_parse.py:75(__init__)
3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_parse.py:98(__init__)
4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 string.py:48(lower)
profile.run("inspect2.findsource(cgi.FormContent)")
4105 function calls in 2.441 CPU seconds

Ordered by: standard name

ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
1 0.023 0.023 2.237 2.237 <string>:1(?)
1 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 inspect2.py:279(getfile)
1 0.062 0.062 0.176 0.176
inspect2.py:318(getsourcefile)
2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 inspect2.py:33(ismodule)
1 0.834 0.834 2.215 2.215
inspect2.py:368(findsource)
2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 inspect2.py:41(isclass)
1 0.089 0.089 0.089 0.089 ntpath.py:244(exists)
1 0.203 0.203 2.441 2.441
profile:0(inspect2.findsource(cgi
.FormContent))
0 0.000 0.000 profile:0(profiler)
4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 string.py:48(lower)
4091 1.205 0.000 1.205 0.000
tokenize.py:135(generate_tokens)

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 3 of 3 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppython-list @
categoriespython
postedJan 10, '02 at 12:15a
activeJan 11, '02 at 8:39p
posts3
users2
websitepython.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase