Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I don't see why views should be special. Tables clearly should be
because we can open them directly.
Ah, I didn't think of that. Good idea. So we don't need this patch?

why do we agree on a patch, implement it and reject it then?
would be easier to reject it before actually implementing it ...
it is quite hard to explain to a customer that something is rejected
after approval - even if things are written properly ...
Agreed. The problem with this patch is that originally we just wanted
views, and later the idea of putting a query in there was agreed on, so
the feature request has changed over time.

Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts


Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 9 of 55 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppgsql-patches @
postedSep 29, '05 at 9:44a
activeAug 24, '06 at 6:58p



site design / logo © 2019 Grokbase