FAQ
Emil,
That would tend to make sense given the results I am seeing. I am/was
just paranoid that I've lost data - but everything says not an that its
just a blip in the sequencing.
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 12:50 +0200, Emil Obermayr wrote:

Maybe its because the sequence gets a batch of IDs in the cache and
discards it with a crash? So unused sequence-ID get lost, while the
sequence is reset to the number of the last really used ID during a
normal shutdown?

Just a thought.

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 6 of 7 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppgsql-novice @
categoriespostgresql
postedApr 15, '08 at 9:35a
activeApr 15, '08 at 5:04p
posts7
users4
websitepostgresql.org
irc#postgresql

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase