On 29-Jun-99 Jackson, DeJuan wrote:
Would a PostgreSQL / PHP solution be practical for the Feature/Bug
Would a PostgreSQL / PHP solution be practical for the Feature/Bug
(I'm thinking specifically of the mirrors here.)
-DEJ
How 'bout JitterBug? http://samba.anu.edu.au/jitterbug/-DEJ
or GNATS: http://www.cs.utah.edu/csinfo/texinfo/gnats/gnats.html
FreeBSD, but...
Ouch, JitterBug looks painful :(
I'm willing to install either, but I think that GNATs, from what I'm used
to of it, is the better one, since it allows for email based bug
reports...
And how will this affect the mirrors? Do they have to install the
same software? Will they get static bug report pages that they update once
a day?
I have no clue how the mirroring works.
Folks,
Not sure if this is the right place to request this, but here are
Not sure if this is the right place to request this, but here are
things I, as a satisfied user of PostgreSQL, would like to see done
I'd be glad to help where I can). All of these are just
geared to the care and feeding of the PostgreSQL user community.
These are all good ideas. The problem is getting someone to devotetime to it. We normally focus on announcing features as they are
completed, not tracking features and request counts. They would be
completed, not tracking features and request counts. They would be
value, but we have to weigh the value against actual development
It would certainly be nice to have all the things you mention, but
considering our time is limited, I think we are properly allocating
considering our time is limited, I think we are properly allocating
time we have.
