On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Hm, I see 4 places in HEAD. But in any case, is
My mistake. I had REL9_2_STABLE checked out.
int16 values[1]; /* VARIABLE LENGTH ARRAY */
} int2vector; /* VARIABLE LENGTH STRUCT */

really better than

int16 values[FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER];
} int2vector;

? I don't think so.
I can see your point. Now that I look at the comments beside
FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER, I see that indeed, as I suspected, the
Microsoft flexible array members are not completely compatible with
C99 style flexible arrays, so this may be the least-worst option.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 9 of 18 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppgsql-hackers @
categoriespostgresql
postedApr 5, '13 at 10:14p
activeJul 23, '13 at 8:30a
posts18
users7
websitepostgresql.org...
irc#postgresql

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase