Jameison Martin writes:
[separate topic: pluggable heap manager]
I'm quite interested in pursuing more aggressive compression
strategies, and I'd like to do so in the context of the heap
manager. I'm exploring having a pluggable heap manager implementation
and would be interested in feedback on that as a general approach. My
thinking is that I'd like to be able to have PostgreSQL support
multiple heap implementations along the lines of how multiple index
types are supported, though probably only the existing heap manager
implementation would be part of the actual codeline.
There's been some previous talk about "pluggable heap managers"; you
might try searching our archives. Unfortunately the story is not very
good, especially if what you are really interested in is playing games
with the format of heap tuples. We just haven't got an abstraction
boundary that isolates that very well. I think the first thing that
would have to be worked out before we could even discuss having multiple
heap managers is where the abstraction boundary would get drawn and how
we'd have to refactor existing code to make it fly.
If I do decide to pursue this, can anyone suggest the best way solicit
feedback?
Usually people just post proposals for discussion on pgsql-hackers.
Obviously, at the early stages such a proposal might be pretty vague,
but that's fine as long as you can explain what kind of feedback you're
hoping for.

regards, tom lane

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 28 of 28 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppgsql-hackers @
categoriespostgresql
postedApr 17, '12 at 4:23p
activeAug 10, '12 at 12:06a
posts28
users8
websitepostgresql.org...
irc#postgresql

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase