On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Let's not go looking for reasons to
reject the approach just because we didn't expect it to work as well
as it does.
Who here, in your opinion, is looking for reasons to reject anything?Let's not go looking for reasons to
reject the approach just because we didn't expect it to work as well
as it does.
can be justified considering that the test results are all on one
side. It wouldn't take a lot of evidence to convince me that this is
a bad idea, but it will take more than none, which is the amount we
have now.
