On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Let's not go looking for reasons to
reject the approach just because we didn't expect it to work as well
as it does.
Who here, in your opinion, is looking for reasons to reject anything?
I'm just saying that there seems to be a bit more skepticism here than
can be justified considering that the test results are all on one
side. It wouldn't take a lot of evidence to convince me that this is
a bad idea, but it will take more than none, which is the amount we
have now.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 18 of 28 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppgsql-hackers @
categoriespostgresql
postedApr 17, '12 at 4:23p
activeAug 10, '12 at 12:06a
posts28
users8
websitepostgresql.org...
irc#postgresql

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase