Robert Haas wrote:
blows over?
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Chris Campbell wrote:
The flurry of patches that vendors have recently been making to OpenSSL to address
the potential man-in-the-middle attack during SSL renegotiation have disabled SSL
renegotiation altogether in the OpenSSL libraries. Applications that make use of SSL
renegotiation, such as PostgreSQL, start failing.
Should we think about adding a GUC to disable renegotiation until thisThe flurry of patches that vendors have recently been making to OpenSSL to address
the potential man-in-the-middle attack during SSL renegotiation have disabled SSL
renegotiation altogether in the OpenSSL libraries. Applications that make use of SSL
renegotiation, such as PostgreSQL, start failing.
blows over?
renegotiation code, from the field it seems that there are very very few
daemons actually doing that kind forced renegotiation.
Stefan