On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 18:22, Yannick Lecaillez wrote:
Le mar 06/07/2004 à 19:07, Alvaro Herrera a écrit :
performance, while at it ...Perhaps could be interesting to look at cluster file system which
seems to have same problems and find solution about locking (i.e
OpenGFS).
http://opengfs.sourceforge.net/showdoc.php?docpath=cvsmirror/opengfs/docs/ogfs-locking&doctitle=Locking&docauthor=ben.m.cahill(at)intel.com
Found on google a clustered shared memory (openMosix project)
http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=8989/ur0404l/
I would have the pgsql-hackers genius for do that :) . I think its the
only feature which force company to buy 50000$ Oracle licence ...
Le mar 06/07/2004 à 19:07, Alvaro Herrera a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:17:16PM +0200, Yannick Lecaillez wrote:
What need to do (understand, to devel) to allow several
postgres instance running from several server to access to the
same data (no replication at all) hosted on a SAN ?
Clustered shared memory, cluster-wide spinlocks. And with decentWhat need to do (understand, to devel) to allow several
postgres instance running from several server to access to the
same data (no replication at all) hosted on a SAN ?
performance, while at it ...
seems to have same problems and find solution about locking (i.e
OpenGFS).
http://opengfs.sourceforge.net/showdoc.php?docpath=cvsmirror/opengfs/docs/ogfs-locking&doctitle=Locking&docauthor=ben.m.cahill(at)intel.com
Found on google a clustered shared memory (openMosix project)
http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=8989/ur0404l/
I would have the pgsql-hackers genius for do that :) . I think its the
only feature which force company to buy 50000$ Oracle licence ...
Major performance issues were not resolved until 9i emerged, almost 10
years later...
It won't take PostgreSQL 10 years, but its impossible now, as Peter
observes.
Best regards, Simon Riggs
