On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 18:18, greg@turnstep.com wrote:
The GUC route sounds good. I'd like to see ctid handling beefed up at the
same time. For example, some operators such as != would be nice and might
ease the pain a little for people used to using oids as their "tuple id" :)
Are we encouraging the use of ctids by applications?

-Neil

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 5 of 8 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppgsql-hackers @
categoriespostgresql
postedSep 29, '03 at 9:34p
activeSep 29, '03 at 11:51p
posts8
users4
websitepostgresql.org...
irc#postgresql

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase