FAQ

Possible solutions: (a) rename tables in one test or the other,
or (b) use TEMPORARY tables in one test or the other. I kinda
like (b), just to exercise temp tables in some interesting new
ways. Whaddya think?
I have a preference for (a). If we want to test temporary tables, let's
have a test which does that. But having a possible name conflict mixed
in to another test seems to be asking for trouble, or at least does not
decouple things as much as they could be.

There is a benefit to having complex tests (a great benefit) but without
also having decoupled tests the diagnostic benefit is not as clear cut
imho.

Bruce, would you have time to generate a regression test for temporary
tables? If we don't have one now, we should.

- Thomas

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 18 of 22 | next ›
Discussion Overview
grouppgsql-hackers @
categoriespostgresql
postedMay 10, '01 at 5:25p
activeMay 13, '01 at 1:34a
posts22
users4
websitepostgresql.org...
irc#postgresql

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase