I apologise for my previous email. It was a disorganised mess that didn't really
make the case for that function very well. So here's a proper proposal (perhaps
I am proposing a function, named array_pick(), which takes a single (array)
argument, and returns a random value from it.
mixed array_pick(array $array);
The function returns the value of one random array element from $array. Should
said array be empty, then it should return NULL.
- array_rand exists, however it only gets a random key, not a random value. This
is the logical counterpart for API completeness
- array_pick is more convenient than $a[array_rand($a)], especially for these
- short array syntax + array_pick, e.g. some_func(array_pick(['foo.png',
'bar.jpg', 'foobar.gif'])) vs $a = ['foo.png, 'bar.jpg', 'foobar.gif'];
- where using long names or nested arrays, e.g.
- array_pick is less wasteful than shuffling an array and taking the first
- $a[array_rand($a)] issuse a NOTICE from an undefined index if the array is
empty, but array_pick() just returns null, which is more convenient
- I need this function myself quite often. It exists in two other languages I
use that I can think of off the top of my head (Python, Game Maker Language)
- PHP has too many functions
- Yes, but that doesn't mean we can't add more. Otherwise we can't improve
things and move forward.
- This can be easily implemented in userland code/this is too frivolous to
- This is true, however similarly to a lot of standard library functionality, it
is used frequently enough that it is silly to have to rewrite it every time it
- It is also the logical counterpart to array_rand(). One for a key, one for a
- The name isn't logical
- Whilst you could argue that array_rand_key is a better name, I have chosen
array_pick because it is shorter, and has a similar name to similar functions in
Python (random.choice) and GML (choose)
- However, this could be changed.