On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:59 +0200, Daniel K. wrote:
On 10/06/2011 05:55 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
On 10/6/11 5:31 PM, Daniel K. wrote:
A patch was appended, discussed, and improved, and I have uploaded a
test-case, as well as a minimal patch that fixes the problem (attached)
to the original bug-report.


The patch still applies to trunk, and I think it should be applied to
the 5.3 and 5.4 branches as well.
As far as I can see, the patch looks good, so it can be applied to 5.4
and trunk. If I don't hear any objections and nobody beats me to it,
I'll do it in a couple of days (a bit busy now).
OK, thanks.

But what about 5.3? there is no ABI issue with this, just a spurious
warning that goes away.
I think 5.3 is fine, too. But please extend the test a bit. The current
one will pass even if the process segfaults. At least print something at
the end.


Search Discussions

Discussion Posts


Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 10 of 15 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupphp-internals @
postedSep 23, '11 at 12:06p
activeOct 7, '11 at 6:51p



site design / logo © 2022 Grokbase