FAQ

On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:20:40PM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
But I really like its balance of complexity -vs- functionality; I
like the way it exposes as much as you want of its underpinnings. By
sticking strictly to a directory heirarchy of RCS files, it may end
up with limitations that turn icko when you want to rename things
(although create and remove isn't an awful way of handling it). But
it retains lovely compatibility with other tools.
Why sticking with RCS is a limitation? I can move RCS files around
without any problem. All what is needed is a file with a mapping
"real name" => "the name in the source tree".

Ilya

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts

Previous

Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 20 of 45 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupperl6-porters @
categoriesperl
postedApr 4, '00 at 8:18p
activeApr 7, '00 at 2:09p
posts45
users13
websiteperl6.org

People

Translate

site design / logo © 2019 Grokbase