M.J.T. Guy writes:
Bob French writes:
Why 5.005_02? because thats what showed at gnu.org at the time. I've gone to
the perl site and will give 5.005_03 a whirl.
This is far from the first time that someone has (possibly) wasted their
time by putting effort into an out-of date version. Would the
attached patch to INSTALL be a Good Thing? >
I had a slight difficulty in choosing the URL to include. Ideally it
should lead somewhere which says authoritatively "Latest is 5.005_03".
The only authoritative source is CPAN; on CPAN this information is only
obviously available encoded in the URL itself >
http://www.perl.com/CPAN/src/latest_is_5.005_03 >
and including that would be self-defeating. And also, if you do try
to look at that, you get a really exciting blank page. Should there
be a file somewhere (e.g. at http://www.perl.com/CPAN/src/latest )
which contains just that statement?
Such as the http://www.perl.com/CPAN/src/latest.tar.gz and
http://www.perl.com/CPAN/src/latest.zip, explained in

$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts


Follow ups

Related Discussions

Discussion Navigation
viewthread | post
posts ‹ prev | 4 of 7 | next ›
Discussion Overview
groupperl5-porters @
postedOct 25, '99 at 9:09p
activeOct 28, '99 at 3:08p



site design / logo © 2021 Grokbase