demerphq wrote:
5. Should be distributed.
What, precisely, do you mean by this one? I ask because a lot of what some
people think of as a "distributed" VCS is more about merging and generation of
patches and less about "make sure the repository is everywhere." From a
security standpoint, large projects will *always* have a master repository that
is considered authoritative. I realize that git and hg (don't know about bzr)
blurs this distinction a lot, but from a project standpoint, a central
repository with limited list of committers has a very long history for a good


John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Blvd
Suite H
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747

Search Discussions

Discussion Posts


Follow ups

Related Discussions



site design / logo © 2019 Grokbase