Comment on module name Data::ETL

On 05/04/2016 09:27 AM, Smylers wrote:
Robert Wohlfarth writes:
Not necessarily. That would be effectively claiming the ETL:: namespace
is for your suite of modules.

An alternative would be to create the ETL:: top-level namespace and then
put your framework under another level of hierarchy there, leaving space
for other ETL modules to share ETL::. As in:

• ETL::$Brand
• ETL::$Brand::Extract
• ETL::$Brand::Extract::Excel
• ETL::$Brand::Extract::DelimitedText
• ETL::$Brand::Extract::XML
• ETL::$Brand::Load
• ETL::$Brand::Load::MSAccess

— where $Brand is a word/phrase of your choice (either just a fanciful
name you like, or one you think sums up your particular ETL module suite
over other (potentially yet to be written) options.