Net::Vimeo::API - namespace question
Mar 10, 2009 at 2:23 pm
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Jonathan Yu wrote:
That would be my choice. Adding "API" seems redundant.
: Chris: I'm not sure of the best answer here, though I do know that top-level namespaces (like Vimeo::API) are generally frowned upon. A cursory search of "API" turns up: - WWW::Facebook::API - WWW::Bebo::API As the first two results. On the other hand, some people have used the namespace WebService:: for this sort of thing. Personally I'd go for WWW::Vimeo. Oh, as an aside, I think the general recommendation is to instantiate objects as: WWW::Vimeo->new rather than the new keyword. I think this
: Agreed. That's in line with the de-facto standard. -- Andy Armstrong, Hexten
: WWW::Vimeo it is then. Thanks for all the input. - Hide quoted text - Best, Chris. -- Chris Vertonghen http://friendfeed.com/cvertonghen
: I agree about dropping API, but prefer Net. WWW to me suggests web browsers and HTML.
Namespace for new perl (chess) module
Namespace question: ok if I use Text::Locale
Namespace question for new module
Top-level namespace question
Namespace question: Ekahau location sensing system
Namespace question for IDS
Weather-related namespace question
Re: HTML.pm (Was: Weather-related namespace question)
Namespace for an application?
PDF in Marpa::XS distribution?
4 of 8
Mar 10, '09 at 1:52p
Mar 10, '09 at 6:44p
6 users in discussion
Chris Vertonghen (2)
David Golden (2)
Andy Armstrong (1)
Jonathan Yu (1)
Bill Ward (1)
Chris Vertonghen (1)
Groups & Organizations
site design / logo © 2018 Grokbase